Posted under General
Curious about these:
post #6637691
post #6637693
post #6637694
post #6637810
post #6637812
I appealed them and it simply seems that every approver that reviewed them simply disapproved them because of disinterest. Which is understandable, given that there doesn't seem to be any other choice for now than a more subjective approach for image approvals.
I still think these are quite acceptable, though, is there any problem besides the disinterest?
SisterTea said:
Curious about these:
post #6637691
post #6637693
post #6637694
post #6637810
post #6637812I appealed them and it simply seems that every approver that reviewed them simply disapproved them because of disinterest. Which is understandable, given that there doesn't seem to be any other choice for now than a more subjective approach for image approvals.
I still think these are quite acceptable, though, is there any problem besides the disinterest?
Your appeal messages say the anatomy is fine but i really thingk the anatomy is fairly clumsy here; not terrible but unsurprising approvers didn't want their names to appear on those.
This artist seems to have issues with foreshortening the body (post #6637694 , post #6637810 , post #6637812), with breasts themselves (post #6637812 , post #6637693, post #6637694), and general body structure (post #6637693 worst offender imo), despite the style needing those fundamentals to work, added with the limited amount of polishing, the least questionable quality is post #6637691 imo.
My additional two cents is that i'm actually surprised more posts under this artist aren't deleted, i just don't find them bad enough to flag them myself
Mayhem-Chan said:
Your appeal messages say the anatomy is fine but i really thingk the anatomy is fairly clumsy here; not terrible but unsurprising approvers didn't want their names to appear on those.
This artist seems to have issues with foreshortening the body (post #6637694 , post #6637810 , post #6637812), with breasts themselves (post #6637812 , post #6637693, post #6637694), and general body structure (post #6637693 worst offender imo), despite the style needing those fundamentals to work, added with the limited amount of polishing, the least questionable quality is post #6637691 imo.
My additional two cents is that i'm actually surprised more posts under this artist aren't deleted, i just don't find them bad enough to flag them myself
So basically images from this artist are sort of risky in that regard? I considered all of them alright, but it's good to have another point of view, more experienced with reviewing.
I'll be taking that advice then.
What's wrong with these posts? They're official art and (to my eyes) look pretty good.
post #6621760 is a larger, uncropped version of a prior approved post with better color quality
post #6634886 I can only assume was rejected because it depicts a petite, huge-breasted character but given that that's nothing new to danbooru I'd like to know if there's any other reason to look out for.
Just wondering...
Deleted post is part of pool #2420, an ongoing 4koma series that resumed recently.
The next comic after the deleted one (post #6654855), got approved.
Honestly...
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6642737?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6642780?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6643612?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6643906?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6644375?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6645729?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6646820?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
Is there something wrong with these 7 images? You have rejected all of them, and why ?
anything wrong with these posts?
post #6638402
post #6638435
post #6634733
Will fix if needed
And another three rejected images:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6647263?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6647729?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6649652?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
I repeat the answer: Is there something wrong with these images, and the another seven?
Casriun said:
anything wrong with these posts?
post #6638402
post #6638435
post #6634733
Will fix if needed
Questionable quality is all i can see
Rhaizen said:
And another three rejected images:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6647263?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6647729?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6649652?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizenI repeat the answer: Is there something wrong with these images, and the another seven?
(including the previous seven) They're not all equals but most of these are "meh" quality
post #6645513
post #6649010
post #6649996
post #6650016
I want to fight for them, their quality is up to standard
QQWWU said:
post #6645513
post #6649010
post #6649996
post #6650016
I want to fight for them, their quality is up to standard
If you want to fight for them you can appeal each image once, though it costs three upload slots.
Rhaizen said:
And any image need, necessarily, to be a work of art and/or a masterpiece?
Not necessarily, but you should look for images that you think are better than average for your standards to archive them here. Look for anatomy, shading, foreshortening -drawing issues in general, source them properly and chances are they'll get approved.
You can see yuri approver:any or yuri sex status:active as a member level user to get an idea of what posts and artists usually get approved or are posted by unrestricted users. I'm not the greatest but personally, I wouldn't post or approve some of the active posts, even though I love yuri.
Mayhem-Chan said:
Questionable quality is all i can see
Image quality?
post #6638402
If so, the author has another drawing of the same quality.
post #4042234
And this one just says "disinterest", they don't give me a specific reason if there is something wrong with the image.
post #6638435
Casriun said:
Image quality?
post #6638402
If so, the author has another drawing of the same quality.
post #4042234
No, the first one is definitely worse. Pretty much everything about it is bad, except maybe the eyes.
Some feedback on post #6649416 please? All the child posts got approved and it is the same quality so I don't really know why it wouldn't get approved.
Edit: thanks Nacha for approving it
Updated
Requesting feedback on these 6 please:
post #6589930
post #6589931
post #6589933
post #6591009
post #6604746
post #6621409
Not sure why post #6646610 got rejected, I've uploaded a few other pics of similar quality from the same artist here and they all got through no problem
