post #6457119
Thoughts on why this one may have been deleted? I've kind of accepted that the appeal won't go through but I'd appreciate some tips for the future.
Posted under General
post #6457119
Thoughts on why this one may have been deleted? I've kind of accepted that the appeal won't go through but I'd appreciate some tips for the future.
post #6463699
why was this deleted?
Barbatos_Rex said:
post #6463699
why was this deleted?
A mix of third-party source, duplicate, md5 mismatch, no arttag and mintagging for me.
post #6463579
What was so much worse about it than the parent that it wasn't approved?
post #6456989
What is wrong with this one? It's a concept art of an Azur Lane's skin (this one post #6446068) from the official artist.
Why have these been deleted
post #6444326
post #6460557
post #6435130
post #6433548
post #6351383
Anything particularly wrong with these?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6249843
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6295178
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6311935
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6311961
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6402891
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6402894
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6402903
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6441541
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6441559https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6466117
Updated
What's the problem with these
post #6468300
post #6468318
post #6467743
Any particular reason these didn't get through?
post #6465024
post #6464980
Wanted to thank CoreMack for approving an upload that was previously deleted. I assume it went by quick, and that's why no one approved it.
Here are three more recent ones that I would like feedback on:
Updated
MultiLimbedXeno said:
Wanted to thank CoreMack for approving an upload that was previously deleted. I assume it went by quick, and that's why no one approved it.
Here are three more recent ones that I would like feedback on:
Western stuff and low resolution images are harder to get approved and the third post is of poor quality imo. I approved the 2nd, but you should tag your posts as best as you can instead of mintagging or using tagme and should also stop using solo focus for solo posts.
Individual said:
Western stuff and low resolution images are harder to get approved and the third post is of poor quality imo. I approved the 2nd, but you should tag your posts as best as you can instead of mintagging or using tagme and should also stop using solo focus for solo posts.
Understood. With that being said, is there anyone that wants to take a 2nd look at this? I think the 1st one is pretty high quality.
post #6439279
post #6471812
Updated
post #6473622
The quality is very good, I don't understand why you guys don't like this artist's work, I have uploaded many times but failed to pass the review
post #6460918
It is part of story of a blue archive silent comic pool. The artstyle is the author choices and i think the quality is pretty decent. What's wrong with this post?
post #6467983
I think the quality is just as good as the artist's other work, I don't know why this one is having such a hard time getting approved.
Hello, I would like some feedback on post #6474873 and post #6474801 please, is there something wrong with them that I am not seeing?
glasnost said:
Based on your deleted uploads, here are some things I think you should watch out for:
- Photos/screencaps/photoshops (i.e. post #607028, post #635704): Anything that is not an original piece of art is at a disadvantage in the moderation process right from the get go.
- JPEG artifacts (i.e. post #625844, post #678880): A little bit of distortion is acceptable; stuff at the level of post #678880 is absurd and would probably not get approved regardless of art quality. Usually, this is a result of one or more rounds of resaving, so if you get art direct from the producer, you won't have to worry about this as much.
- Resolution (i.e. post #627797, post #678875): Below a certain size, pictures just get too small to be interesting. My personal threshold is somewhere around 0.2 megapixels (that is, a ~450x450 image), but use your judgement and you should be fine.
- Watermarks/copyright marks (i.e. post #696021, post #608608): Not a huge strike against an image, but a strike nonetheless.
And one less objective piece of advice: it looks like several of your deleted images are from DBZ, which, like most shounen series, are approved less often on Danbooru simply by virtue of the composition of the moderation team. It's somewhat unfortunate, but pictures from that copyright are probably going to be held to a higher standard than pictures of, say, Touhou characters. If you post strictly good art, it won't become an issue, but be wary of that grey zone between good and 'meh', because you may be less likely to get the benefit of the doubt.
Are edits of original renders (like Duel Links ones ) and colorings of existing lineart (by other people) fine?
JetixBeauty said:
Are edits of original renders (like Duel Links ones ) and colorings of existing lineart (by other people) fine?
Third-party edits/colorizations are considered borderline. You might get lucky if it's really good, but we generally prefer to keep them away. You should read the upload rules.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6474175 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6477172
Same pictures are reposted by purple posters from another source after mine posts and my posts got pruned, very cool
Also for asshole who wrote this "(disinterest: Check for better versions before posting next time)" It was uploaded before pixiv version came