Posted under General
I'm not sure why this one didn't go through, the other posts from the same artist have like 30-40 favorites each and look pretty much the same style and quality: post #4633838, post #4633860, post #4633828
This one I guess is significantly low enough quality to be rejected, but I disagree about the above.
Also, not sure why this parent revision was done (the sources aren't related), maybe @Talulah can chime in?
Dave816 said:
Also, not sure why this parent revision was done (the sources aren't related), maybe @Talulah can chime in?
Talulah said:
They looked related (same theme with the other two Holo EN cast members, same artist), so I parented them. If you think it's a mistake you can undo it.
I agree with the parenting, for what it's worth.
Dave816 said:
I'm not sure why this one didn't go through, the other posts from the same artist have like 30-40 favorites each and look pretty much the same style and quality: post #4633838, post #4633860, post #4633828
Favorites and scores do not matter to an image being approved. There are deleted images with triple-digit favorites/score and there are approved images with a double-digit negative score.
We approve/delete images (mostly) on individual merit. An artist can have a bad day. 50 approved and 1 deleted does not mean that the last 1 should be approved.
Alright... tell me why these are bad.
post #4641125
post #4466695
post #4639391
post #4636360
post #4636158
post #4155543
Cluless said:
post #4641125
post #4466695
post #4639391
post #4636360
post #4636158
post #4155543
In my opinion:
1. Face is kinda meh. It's not off-topic to me, but I skipped it, because I kinda don't like how she was drawn in that style and her face is weird to me.
2. Hard to tell. It kinda looks mediocre to me, the faces a bit weird. Not really bad.
3. Bad hands, bad nipples, bad breasts etc. It's a kinda lazy image where there was no effort put into the for example crotch area. It just looks wrong. Even the breast forgot to "fall" down into the correct direction. (Always remember that there is no use in appealing an image that was just deleted. The approvers won't see it again, if you don't wait at least one month.)
4. Bad anatomy to me. It's always that artist try to draw a situation where you can see the ass and the breasts like that and it always just looks wrong. The legs don't make it better here.
5. Extremely short leg.
6. The girl is missing depth. She looks so flat and her arms are kinda bad too.
What is wrong with this one? post #4639290
Cluless said:
Alright... tell me why these are bad.
post #4641125
post #4466695
post #4639391
post #4636360
post #4636158
post #4155543
I agree with Guaro except I think you just got unlucky on #2 being skipped by approvers. Maybe the ones that saw it weren't fans of Azur Lane or didn't think it was fitting to the characters or something. I know nothing about that game
Alvaspirdoyas said:
What is wrong with this one? post #4639290
Legs, arms, 'pectorals' all look somewhat off. Face a bit flat too. And the background colors are just... weird. The different colors and the waterline in particular.
Edit: Also, self uploads are kinda frowned upon.
Updated
vivoleko01 said:
Legs seem short, outline looks sketchy, looks a bit rushed overall
I'll admit that I have something of a vested interest in this one. I commissioned it. But I didn't know until now that it was uploaded here.
I was wondering what would prevent it from being approved. Doesn't seem too different from the artist's other works.
Narrator-1 said:
I'll admit that I have something of a vested interest in this one. I commissioned it. But I didn't know until now that it was uploaded here.
I was wondering what would prevent it from being approved. Doesn't seem too different from the artist's other works.
Lower body anatomy
post #4642062
post #4627670
post #4627666
Hi! i would like on feedback why these didn't get approved. At first i thought approvers missed it so i appealed it because i really think these are danbooru quality, but still didn't get approved. So yeah.
There are other posts from the artist with same quality that are approved
Narrator-1 said:
I'll admit that I have something of a vested interest in this one. I commissioned it. But I didn't know until now that it was uploaded here.
I was wondering what would prevent it from being approved. Doesn't seem too different from the artist's other works.
It has only been up for 21 hours, there is still a chance it might be approved.
Narrator-1 said:
I'll admit that I have something of a vested interest in this one. I commissioned it. But I didn't know until now that it was uploaded here.
I was wondering what would prevent it from being approved. Doesn't seem too different from the artist's other works.
Personally I skipped it because of the legs.
I'd like to know why will these posts be deleted?
post #4639226
post #4637601
post #4637398
post #4637469
post #4637561
post #4637134
post #4616159
2HoTLBumper said:
post #4642062
post #4627670
post #4627666Hi! i would like on feedback why these didn't get approved. At first i thought approvers missed it so i appealed it because i really think these are danbooru quality, but still didn't get approved. So yeah.
There are other posts from the artist with same quality that are approved
I think the first is mostly fine (though I think her hands may be backwards or just missing a thumb) but the quick paint style probably turned approvers off.
For 2/3 I feel like the angle of her body vs her breasts and butt cheeks is off
2HoTLBumper said:
post #4642062
post #4627670
post #4627666Hi! i would like on feedback why these didn't get approved. At first i thought approvers missed it so i appealed it because i really think these are danbooru quality, but still didn't get approved. So yeah.
There are other posts from the artist with same quality that are approved
1. Nue's face looks nice but the rest of her body looks weird/low-effort. Also, I didn't care about the wings but they look terrible
2, 3. Undeleted bc I couldn't find anything wrong with these pictures
Lemme guess: "Too Western"? It's still an excellent Rosaria artwork. Besides, Western artworks of anime characters aren't innately forbidden.
For instance, post #4635978 looks Western and it was still readily accepted by Qpax.
Updated
