what exactly is wrong with my work？
post #4619369
post #4490974
Posted under General
what exactly is wrong with my work？
post #4619369
post #4490974
pronebone said:
Hands and fingers look off but otherwise the overall art is okayish.
pronebone said:
Approved - the face is really nice. I think the shading on the rest of the picture could've been done better though, but imo it doesn't ruin the overall quality.
Bad foreshortening on both her arms (they look very short) & her right hand is too big. Otherwise it would've been a decent picture.
Updated
post #4625580
This post (and its child posts) I uploaded got "After 3 days deleted". Why?
So I could learn on to do not to do next times.
what's wrong with post #4623617, post #4624661, and post #4625614?
post #4620993 (explicit) so I uploaded a bunch of works from this artist and nearly updated their entire recent gallery. Why is this the only one considered not good enough?
A tip for all of y'all:
Don't appeal things immediately after they get deleted. The queue doesn't reset that quickly so people who already saw it won't see it again. If you appeal that quickly, you're just shouting into the void. And you can't appeal things more than once.
The queue resets after 30 days. If you can see "x people didn't like it", it has been reset and you should wait.
Veradux said:
A tip for all of y'all:
Don't appeal things immediately after they get deleted. The queue doesn't reset that quickly so people who already saw it won't see it again. If you appeal that quickly, you're just shouting into the void. And you can't appeal things more than once.
The queue resets after 30 days. If you can see "x people didn't like it", it has been reset and you should wait.
My mistake. I got overzealous and impatient, clearly not knowledgeable in how the queue works. I blindly backed myself into a corner and don't want those appeals to go to waste, so in case those aren't going to be seen I'd like another look at my recent deletions, which came in a frightening wave than what I expected (yes I'm consciously trying to be good with my ratio, sue me.) I'll keep it in mind and will refrain from instant appealing.
post #4624708 is just a crop of approved post #4624712
post #4624960
post #4625158 + child post
post #4626319 + 2 child post
post #4626387
Thanks for your time.
ricroll said:
post #4624708 is just a crop of approved post #4624712
You generally probably shouldn't upload cropped versions of other images on Danbooru, even if they were cropped by the artist. They might get approved sometimes but they're effectively inferior duplicates.
Talulah said:
You generally probably shouldn't upload cropped versions of other images on Danbooru, even if they were cropped by the artist. They might get approved sometimes but they're effectively inferior duplicates.
I won't blame anyone except myself, since I did interpret it too literally when someone said on Discord that it's generally better to upload a pixiv set. (Obviously except for previews of paid rewards, blurred edits, etc) If I had realized that putting the crop was a bad idea, I wouldn't have done it. I can accept not upping it at all I just wish I didnt have an unnecessary deletion against me.
Updated
ricroll said:
My mistake. I got overzealous and impatient, clearly not knowledgeable in how the queue works.
Made the same mistake myself recently (for an unconventional page in a comic series) when I got confused by the pop-up message.
ricroll said:
I blindly backed myself into a corner and don't want those appeals to go to waste, so in case those aren't going to be seen I'd like another look at my recent deletions, which came in a frightening wave than what I expected (yes I'm consciously trying to be good with my ratio, sue me.) I'll keep it in mind and will refrain from instant appealing.
post #4624708 is just a crop of approved post #4624712
post #4624960
post #4625158 + child post
post #4626319 + 2 child post
post #4626387Thanks for your time.
Odd noodly arms and contour of jacket following said arms. Cleavage line and knee also look a bit weird. Though overall not too bad. TL'd the commentary for you, for what's it worth.
Overall decentish. If I were to speculate Maybe the Western art style combined with the odd 'clashing' background color choices and obtrusive signatures make people less inclined to approve.
Odd shoulders, arms and hands. Face of right girl looks a bit off. Somewhat odd balance between the breasts and the rest of the body (granted, a lot of other art also has similar proportions). Overall not too bad (but not outstanding either), but 'pure' lewds sometimes get judged by a higher standard (because we already have a lot of lewds).
TL'd the commentary for you, for what's it worth. And rearranged the parenting order (yes, the Pixiv had it arranged the way you put it, but I think it makes more sense for the mock cover page to come first before the image variations). Was also going to put a copyright tag on it too, but I wasn't sure how to transliterate/translate that weird webnovel title.
Odd hands. Somewhat odd shoulders. Again, overall not too bad but not outstanding either. Background is also a plain white.
Also TL'd the commentary for you.
ricroll said:
I won't blame anyone except myself, since I did interpret it too literally when someone said on Discord that it's generally better to upload a pixiv set. (Obviously except for previews of paid rewards, blurred edits, etc) If I had realized that putting the crop was a bad idea, I wouldn't have done it. I can accept not upping it at all I just wish I didnt have an unnecessary deletion against me.
Mostly it's Twitter vs Pixiv because Twitter compresses their images. Uploading from Twitter also tends to be a bit more annoying due to poorer tagging and borked previews.
NNescio said:
post #4624960Odd noodly arms and contour of jacket following said arms. Cleavage line and knee also look a bit weird. Though overall not too bad. TL'd the commentary for you, for what's it worth.
Thanks for your time. My earlier comment about post #4620993 still puzzles me. Is it that much drastic of a difference from all my other approved works from that artist? Along with all the ones already there from years ago? It's really grating that it happens to be the only one of all pics from that artist that is deleted. They have older inferior quality works that I won't upload. This one isn't one of them.
Overall decentish. If I were to speculate Maybe the Western art style combined with the odd 'clashing' background color choices and obtrusive signatures make people less inclined to approve.
If the signatures are a main reason and not the character drawing itself that would be a very weak reason for disapprovals imo. Its not our, the uploader, faults that the artist decided to spam links. I figure the background colors are just natural sunset lighting in an open plain field.. :\
Updated
Veradux said:
A tip for all of y'all:
Don't appeal things immediately after they get deleted. The queue doesn't reset that quickly so people who already saw it won't see it again. If you appeal that quickly, you're just shouting into the void. And you can't appeal things more than once.
The queue resets after 30 days. If you can see "x people didn't like it", it has been reset and you should wait.
Thank you for that, I upload so little so I don't really know how system work.
But still why this work I uploaded and its child (post #4625580) aren't approved?
I want to know to not making same mistake again
what exactly is wrong with my work？
post #4619369
post #4490974
come on，anyone say something，So I could learn on to do not to do next times.
post #4627815 -
All right, what wrong with this one...
aoines said:
what exactly is wrong with my work？
post #4619369
post #4490974
come on，anyone say something，So I could learn on to do not to do next times.
Danbooru is not the place where you should upload your own art. There are better sites for this.
The first one is kinda good; but I kinda dislike the colors and the background doesn't really match the girl.
The second has a bad crotch, the ass looks weird and the nipple is wrongly placed I guess. It's not really that bad, but the stuff I mentioned keeps me from approving it.
Cluless said:
post #4627815 -
All right, what wrong with this one...
Bad nipple, waaaay to long legs and the rest is meh. It's missing a lot of details.
And what wrong with this one and its child posts? post #4625580