Missing bolt action rifle implications

BUR #16500 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication m1903_springfield -> rifle
create implication m1903_springfield -> bolt_action
create implication m1917_enfield -> rifle
create implication m1917_enfield -> bolt_action
create implication k31 -> rifle
create implication k31 -> bolt_action
create implication lebel_model_1886 -> bolt_action
create implication lebel_model_1886 -> rifle
create implication mas-36 -> bolt_action
create implication mas-36 -> rifle
create implication p14_enfield -> rifle
create implication p14_enfield -> bolt_action
create implication lee-enfield -> bolt_action
create implication ptrd-41 -> bolt_action
create implication sv-98 -> sniper_rifle
create implication sv-98 -> bolt_action

All of them are WWII-era bolt action rifles, except the SV-98.

The bulk update request #16500 (forum #239892) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #17009 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication steyr_hs_.50 -> bolt_action
create implication steyr_hs_.50 -> anti-materiel_rifle
create implication steyr_iws_2000 -> bolt_action
create implication steyr_iws_2000 -> anti-materiel_rifle
create implication pgm_hecate_ii -> anti-materiel_rifle
create implication pgm_hecate_ii -> bolt_action

Some missing implications. The HS. 50 is a single shot bolt-action AMR, while HS. 50M1 one accepts magazines.
I'm sure gun-related tag BURs always have lesser votes and support compared to other types from most Danbooru users, even experienced ones sadly.

Other related BURs

topic #23931, forum #238062, BUR #16996

I was tempted to leave a downvote for your snark but I don't actually care about all these gun padding tags, so take my meh instead.

AngryZapdos said:

I was tempted to leave a downvote for your snark but I don't actually care about all these gun padding tags, so take my meh instead.

Thank you for your honest effort. Everyone is free to agree or disagree. Apologies if what I said on the reasoning is just too far or too critical (snark), but those are based on what I observed on BURs in various forum topics, even since I joined this site. Seems that the unfairness regarding user reaction and response here is visible. Despite expected a lot of weapons expert lurking this site.
I felt it's unfortunate that many weapon models (more than 10 posts) are left without actual implications, expected the moderation team to talk, ask more and discuss with other users (including lower ranking ones) regarding implication issues. There are some users here willing to share their knowledge helpfully.

I assume the term "padding" might mean implications. I wished implications will make tagging easier and more efficient.
Appreciated your effort on giving meh instead. I would also use "meh" to show neutrality or slight disagreement instead of the harsher downvote.

It's nice that you're working on weapon tags, but I ignore your BURs because as I remember replying to one such request, I'm not educated about guns. Having little to no discussion and votes doesn't hinder approval.

Individual said:

It's nice that you're working on weapon tags, but I ignore your BURs because as I remember replying to one such request, I'm not educated about guns. Having little to no discussion and votes doesn't hinder approval.

That's okay, thank you very much for your honest thoughts and the compliment. (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭
I am very sorry for my latest statements regarding BUR popularity and will not repeat the same complaints in the future. Now I just need to be more patient about it and let all the decision be handled by the site administration team.

The bulk update request #17009 (forum #242226) has been approved by @nonamethanks.