Posted under Tags
Knowledge_Seeker said:
BUR #32005 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_with_chopsticks -> holding_chopsticks
If you're holding something with chopsticks, then you naturally must be already holding chopsticks.
The majority of holding_with_chopsticks -holding_chopsticks is holding from offscreen (post #5742995). What would these be tagged with instead?
tamuraakemi said:
The majority of holding_with_chopsticks -holding_chopsticks is holding from offscreen (post #5742995). What would these be tagged with instead?
I dunno. Not because I think my BUR is invalid, but because I think those belong to a separate phenomenon entirely. I think we need a new tag for that sort of thing, because as of right now, they are currently lumped in with characters holding chopsticks. (Also I wouldn't say "the majority", but a decent chunk of the tag now that I really look at it.)
tamuraakemi said:
I think a specialty tag for that would probably work and don't think the BUR is invalid, just that it's something that I think needs tagging as a lot of those images have that as the central concept
Ah, my aplogies. I agree. I don't got any good name ideas for it though... pov chopsticks? But it's not really from the perspective of the chopstick holder in those images...
BUR #32332 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_pastry_bag -> holding
create implication holding_pastry_bag -> pastry_bag
Self explanatory
BUR #32678 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_charm -> charm_(object)
create implication holding_charm -> holding
Another one.
The bulk update request #32332 (forum #310407) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32005 (forum #309408) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32678 (forum #311791) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #31154 (forum #305970) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Zalza said:
BUR #31154 has been rejected.
Show
create implication holding_lightsaber -> holding_weapon
create implication holding_pinwheel -> holding
create implication holding_razor -> holding
create implication holding_tera_orb -> holding
create implication holding_banner -> banner
create implication holding_pan -> frying_pan
create implication holding_miniperson -> mini_person
create implication holding_rag -> cleaning_rag
create implication holding_pill -> pill
create implication holding_vial -> vial
create implication holding_pacifier -> pacifier
create implication holding_dog_tags -> dog_tags
create implication holding_headgear -> headgear
create implication holding_baton_(weapon) -> baton_(weapon)
create implication holding_rake -> rake
create implication holding_kite -> kite
create implication holding_pants -> unworn_pants
create implication holding_sock -> socks
create implication holding_cd -> cd
create implication holding_bandages -> bandages
create implication holding_shoe -> shoes
create implication holding_crystal -> crystal
create implication holding_heart_(organ) -> heart_(organ)
create implication holding_pill -> holding
create implication holding_vial -> holding
create implication holding_crystal -> holding
create implication holding_heart_(organ) -> holding.
Some of these are wrong (holding pan is not just for frying pans) or need renames (holding miniperson vs mini_person). This is why giant BURs like these are a bad idea.
BUR #32910 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_flamethrower -> holding_weapon
create implication holding_flamethrower -> flamethrower
Flammenwerfer.
The bulk update request #32910 (forum #314454) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #33408 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_cooking_pot -> cooking_pot
create implication holding_cooking_pot -> holding
The bulk update request #33408 (forum #317991) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #34016 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication holding_crepe -> holding_food
create implication holding_crepe -> crepe
i didn't include helltaker ""crepes"" in the tagging, but yes.
BUR #34024 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication holding_cotton_candy -> cotton_candy
create implication holding_cotton_candy -> holding_food
Self explanatory implications.
The bulk update request #34024 (forum #320406) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
nonamethanks said:
Some of these are wrong (holding pan is not just for frying pans) or need renames (holding miniperson vs mini_person). This is why giant BURs like these are a bad idea.
@nonamethanks Would you prefer doing them individually when you have a large list like this or groups of like 3-4 even if they aren't related? I felt afraid of spamming the forum.
