How do I tag this?

post #5331605

Rating for this? I rated it S initially because of the implication, but someone changed it to G. I've changed it back to S for now but not sure.

Talulah said:

post #5331605

Rating for this? I rated it S initially because of the implication, but someone changed it to G. I've changed it back to S for now but not sure.

That’s at least sexually suggestive and should never be rated G.

(topic #8495 is for rating checks, btw)

kittey said:

That’s at least sexually suggestive and should never be rated G.

(topic #8495 is for rating checks, btw)

Ah, forgot about that thread...

Thanks.

post #5564245
I can't use hidden_face because it's deprecated, but don't know the alternative tag(s) to use. Maybe hair_over_face, but the hair is only obscuring the face when looking from the side. Is there a more general tag for this?

0xC0FFEE said:

post #5564245
I can't use hidden_face because it's deprecated, but don't know the alternative tag(s) to use. Maybe hair_over_face, but the hair is only obscuring the face when looking from the side. Is there a more general tag for this?

covered_face?

TirMcDohl said:

covered_face?

Seems appropriate. I added it to the hidden_face wiki entry.

How to tag the eyes on post #5566234? I put googly eyes, but to me those are the ones that you stick onto something and wobble around inside.
Obviously something like "eyes_on_inanimate_object", but I can't seem to find what it is.

Mintboard said:

How to tag the eyes on post #5566234? I put googly eyes, but to me those are the ones that you stick onto something and wobble around inside.
Obviously something like "eyes_on_inanimate_object", but I can't seem to find what it is.

Well, I spent a minutes whether something like that would fit in pool #2388, "Unexplained Body Parts." Then I saw post #5507303 right at the end, and that basically settled that internal debate. Of course, if anyone has any other tags that fit here, they're welcome, too.

Alanis_the_Evoker said:

Well, I spent a minutes whether something like that would fit in pool #2388, "Unexplained Body Parts." Then I saw post #5507303 right at the end, and that basically settled that internal debate. Of course, if anyone has any other tags that fit here, they're welcome, too.

I don't think that applies, it doesn't look like real eyes, just an eye design on a popsicle.

post #5574723

I got three tags I'd like to find:

• Eye tattoo
• Partial see-through underlayer
• Laser light effect

SolRush said:

post #5574723

I got three tags I'd like to find:

• Eye tattoo
• Partial see-through underlayer
• Laser light effect

• marking on cheek + facial tattoo / facepaint / facial mark
• Where?
• lasers / laser / searchlight

post #4975889

Should this "doll" get its own tag? As I said in comment #2244333, it's called/tagged "Tanuki" on Pixiv.

ppp_laivu_stato said:

• Where?

The sheer, skin-tight long-sleeved layer visible on Riko and Yoshiko's shoulders.

SolRush said:

The sheer, skin-tight long-sleeved layer visible on Riko and Yoshiko's shoulders.

I see. Riko might be wearing a bodystocking.

sheer_* have been aliased to see-through_*. I would rather not use see-through shirt for Yoshiko here.

What kind of top is she wearing? post #5581027

Also completely forgot the name of this fringe jacket-like garment: post #5582055

post #5581347

Does this count as topless, or do we have an "outerwear but no shirt/bra" tag?

The_Bob said:

post #5581347

Does this count as topless, or do we have an "outerwear but no shirt/bra" tag?

Not topless, no_bra

post #5586898

No idea how to tag this plastic veil between her and the viewer.

nonamethanks said:

post #5586898

No idea how to tag this plastic veil between her and the viewer.

General term for the stuff is plastic sheeting.

Should triplets, quadruplets, etc. be tagged as such even if not all of them are in the picture? Go-Toubun no Hanayome probably has the most frequent examples, with some like post #5573221 being tagged with twins due to only two of the quintuplets being present.