Should art from an artist's portfolio site be tagged official_art, such as in post #3216289?
Updated by DanbooruBot
Posted under Tags
Should art from an artist's portfolio site be tagged official_art, such as in post #3216289?
Updated by DanbooruBot
Is there a tag for clothing such as post #3200072 ? Usually a dress shirt, slightly too long, sometimes panties are in view, with implications that it's someone else's.
In the same line, is there a tag for oversized clothing under which a character may of may not have any bottoms or underwear? Example: post #3184783
Updated by DanbooruBot
Cappucciruno said:
Is there a tag for clothing such as post #3200072 ? Usually a dress shirt, slightly too long, sometimes panties are in view, with implications that it's someone else's.
borrowed garments perhaps?
Updated by DanbooruBot
Cappucciruno said:
Is there a tag for clothing such as post #3200072 ? Usually a dress shirt, slightly too long, sometimes panties are in view, with implications that it's someone else's.
Not one tag for something so specific, but there are combinations of tags that can be used for the same effect. Oversized_clothes shirt ~bottomless ~no_pants is a good place to start.
In the same line, is there a tag for oversized clothing under which a character may of may not have any bottoms or underwear? Example: post #3184783
See the usage notes for no_pants and bottomless. Also try pool #2385.
Updated by DanbooruBot
iridescent_slime said:
See the usage notes for no_pants and bottomless. Also try pool #2385.
Personally I think the "If the individual depicted is not wearing any lower-body clothing, but the upper-body clothing (typically a shirt) is still concealing the crotch without any indications as to whether they're still wearing underwear, then the image may be tagged bottomless in addition to no_pants." part under grey areas is stupid, those tags shouldn't be used together in solo images.
Updated by DanbooruBot
I'm not tagging a specific post but I noticed the lack of a tag for when someone puts their hand to their ear meaning "call me"
it's a pretty common pose so I find it odd there's no tag for it. I know shaka sign is a tag, but it's not commonly used and I don't think it's quite the same thing...
Updated by DanbooruBot
purikkuri said:
I'm not tagging a specific post but I noticed the lack of a tag for when someone puts their hand to their ear meaning "call me"
it's a pretty common pose so I find it odd there's no tag for it. I know shaka sign is a tag, but it's not commonly used and I don't think it's quite the same thing...
We have hand_phone with a whopping two posts.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Unbreakable said:
Personally I think the "If the individual depicted is not wearing any lower-body clothing, but the upper-body clothing (typically a shirt) is still concealing the crotch without any indications as to whether they're still wearing underwear, then the image may be tagged bottomless in addition to no_pants." part under grey areas is stupid, those tags shouldn't be used together in solo images.
I agree. I would prefer just no pants to be tagged in those situations.
Updated by DanbooruBot
post #3019011 post #2950888 post #2244696 post #2174681 post #2019343 post #1952278 post #1951520 and post #1814513 all feature the same character, but I'm not sure what the tag, if there should be one, should be. Most of the artist's posts on pixiv say "Teru-chan", but a few posts on Pixiv simply refer to her as "Teru". And one of the comments on one Danbooru posts uses "Teruko"
Updated by DanbooruBot
From the looks of it the character is a personification of a teruterubouzu, meaning both "Teru-chan" and "Teruko" are just derivative nicknames, like calling a cat "kitty". Adding "-chan", "-tan", or "-ko" is typical with personifications, which explains the random comment. Honorifics ordinarily aren't considered part of one's name, but in this case it would be appropriate since the character doesn't really have a name in the first place. If the artist consistently calls her "Teru-chan", then that's fine as long as you add a qualifier for the artist, otherwise you could just tag each one personification + teruterubouzu and leave it at that.
Updated by DanbooruBot
kittey said:
We have hand_phone with a whopping two posts.
what a sad and lonely tag... but good to know it exists XD
Updated by DanbooruBot
c933103 said:
What's the tag for Enjo Kousai?
If you see characters on a "date" discussing payment, or money changing hands, then it should probably just be tagged prostitution.
Otherwise, without any apparent indication that one character is paying the other, I don't see how you're supposed to distinguish this activity from ordinary interactions between couples. Maybe they're just on a regular date? Anything beyond that is a matter of individual interpretation.
If you can provide examples of posts where such a tag would be unambiguously correct, I might support creating a new tag. It's just hard for me to conceive of a case where this wouldn't be overly redundant or subjective.
Updated by DanbooruBot
iridescent_slime said:
If you see characters on a "date" discussing payment, or money changing hands, then it should probably just be tagged prostitution.
Otherwise, without any apparent indication that one character is paying the other, I don't see how you're supposed to distinguish this activity from ordinary interactions between couples. Maybe they're just on a regular date? Anything beyond that is a matter of individual interpretation.
If you can provide examples of posts where such a tag would be unambiguously correct, I might support creating a new tag. It's just hard for me to conceive of a case where this wouldn't be overly redundant or subjective.
I was thinking about something directly related to or as a byproduct of the enjo kousai character ranking poll, but I guess prostitution tag would do in this case, thanks.
Updated by DanbooruBot
What are their blue garments? They seem kind of like an apron and waist apron, but covering the back as well
Updated by DanbooruBot
fossilnix said:
What are their blue garments? They seem kind of like an apron and waist apron, but covering the back as well
Updated by DanbooruBot
What do those effects mean on her legs? Twitching? Trembling? post #3225473
Updated by DanbooruBot
Do we have a tag for that kind of sleeves with the fold at the end?
Updated by DanbooruBot
Is it gasoline? Is it petroil? Or just gas? And what's the container called?
Updated by DanbooruBot
nonamethanks said:
Is it gasoline? Is it petroil? Or just gas? And what's the container called?
The container is a jerry can.
Updated by DanbooruBot