Anelaid said:
bandages_over_eye -> bandage_over_eye
Not seeing any images under either tag, did you perhaps mean bandages_over_one_eye -> bandage_over_one_eye?
Posted under General
Anelaid said:
bandages_over_eye -> bandage_over_eye
Not seeing any images under either tag, did you perhaps mean bandages_over_one_eye -> bandage_over_one_eye?
NWF_Renim said:
Not seeing any images under either tag, did you perhaps mean bandages_over_one_eye -> bandage_over_one_eye?
Yeah, that is what I meant, fixing post.
yes, i actually thought that way too at first. but we don't have wiki entries yet to delimit the terms.
besides, artificial lighting can be more specific like lantern, spotlight & neon_lights instead of plain lights. being more specific, in this case, eases tagging.
currently, the lights posts seem even to contain those not artificial at all like post #227979 post #870318 post #511755 and not necessarily night cityscape post #244246
regarding lights and light, i agree that a proper working definition must be given soon enough to avoid piling up of more posts. both entries are quite large enough and it will be a bit hard for those who'll attempt to check and clean it (if we are going to maintain them separately).
another one:
hands_on_chest -> hand_on_chest
reason: the wiki definition already includes either one or both hands.
a similar fashion could be done with the following, however the wiki definition needs to be updated to accomodate the change:
hands_to_chest -> hand_to_chest
and somewhat a related tag implications:
breast_suppress -> hands_to_chest
breast_suppress -> hand_to_chest
The idea of hand_to_chest is for images such as post #933402, post #935828, and post #935721. It would not be beneficial to turn it into a catch-all tag.
There's also the utility of having dual tags, where one tag shows only one hand on a chest and another for both hands. While the hand_on_chest wiki made a provision for two hands, it may still be beneficial to separate them.
Hillside Moose said:
The idea of hand_to_chest is for images such as post #933402, post #935828, and post #935721.
ok, thanks, i see your point. and maybe you're referring to hands_to_chest instead since the posts mentioned seem to support it?
but if we are truly maintaining the importance of the number of hands involved, would it make any difference if we make a breast_suppress for one hand only too, for the sake of consistency of all breast/chest-related terms?
the wiki definition mentions both hands. but it contains posts where there is only one hand like post #3821 post #81102 post #132114 or only one is at least visible like post #220092 post #214629.
Updated
Aliased:
chairs -> chair
bandages_over_one_eye -> bandage_over_one_eye
crates -> crate
cuff -> cuffs
-- I think this is often enough a natural pair to stick with the plural.
As for hand(s) to chest, I can see keeping single and plural separate, like with hips.
In that case, can't implicate breast_suppress to one of them because either could be used.
ok, thanks again. i'm planning to create a tag group for the breast/chest-related terms since they are so many and actively being used. definitions are already set in breasts but those provided in tag_group:body_parts seem incomplete. i'll include the clarifications you pointed out.
EDIT: breasts tag group is already created. work in progress.
Updated
EB said:
magical_girls -> magical_girl
I can see the plural being useful if there are multiple magical girls within a picture.
potato_chips -> potato_chip
Plural seems to be only tag used currently, but a case could be made for singular since there are images with a single potato chip alone. Don't think I have a preference here.