jjj14 said:
post #264422?
I'd say Q.
Posted under General
jjj14 said:
post #264422?
I'd say Q.
MyrMindservant said:
post #204993
Raised back up to E, due to obvious pussy juice.
post #321932 seems Q to me but is rating locked at E.
sgcdonmai said:
Raised back up to E, due to obvious pussy juice.
That's not a pussy juice but sweat as far as I can see.
For future reference, would the type of post #893096 be s or q?
Edit: Thanks sgcdonmai, changed to safe.
Updated
Just noticed, it seems there has been some kind of rating vandalism again.
rating:s + pussy yeilds over 140 results and rating:q + pussy yeilds over 2700 results...
Looking at the tag history, a lot of them have been changed to S or Q without any update on the history. I remember this happened before, but are these new or is there a new "rating hacker" going around again?
Either that or are we expanding our questionable rating to support vaginas as well? I got used to breasts, but vaginas? D:...
Anyways sorry this is a bit off topic but I wasn't sure making a new thread was appropriate.
Read forum #31026 and howto:rate.
Out of around 7 pages of images that were under rating:s pussy search, all but 1 image of the non-deleted posts had had their rating changed by the user bamhammer several months ago. The user was given a -1 to his rating for rating vandalism 3 months ago (but no ban). I went ahead changed all the images under that search that he was involved with back to the rating that was present before his editing.
In most cases his edits were left floating unattributed to anyone, but the rating changes were either left afloat with him as the last editor or they were wrongly attributed to the user who edited after him.
Updated
And while skimming bamhammer's tag edit record, I came across post #530707.
With the hakama slipping like that, and the very prominent underboob, I feel like it ought to be Questionable rather than Safe. However, it seems to be fairly on the edge between the two, so I'd like more input before changing anything.
This kept getting changed back and forth by different users, so I figured it needed to be brought up here. I thought nude breast pressing (with no genitals visible in this image) would be q.
The liquid in the pic looks more like cum than milk to me due to its stick consistency, but there's a carton of milk and some text in the pic which I can't comprehend, so the rating for this might be changed to questionable under this circumstances.
She masturbates (rather explicit content), but on the other hand neither breasts nor her pussy are shown, so it might stay as questionable.
I'd say Q, seeing how runny the liquid in question is and how it's tagged sexually_suggestive.
Questionable.
Danbooru said:
Rating: Explicit
This post is rating locked.
Post=902463 Date='2011-04-23 04:45' User=葉月 Rating=e
Really? From howto:rate I gather that "Actual intercourse, if portrayed in a restrained and tasteful manner" should be rated Questionable. If this rule applies to post #901447, post #895187 and post #724080, then how does it not apply to post #902463? Letting this stand as a precedent would effectively reinstate the "everything unambiguously sexual is Explicit" policy, in my opinion.