Ratings check thread

Is post #650022 really explicit? ditto for post #731988 and post #576257.

The first is questionable for sure. post #576257 is one I'd personally keep as explicit.

Edit: Second one has pussy_juice, but I dunno, I wouldn't really call it explicit. Changed it, but no worries if someone wanted to change it back.

edit: what Evangeline said.

Log said:
post #576257

Nipples, dick, balls - all visible, with some extremely sexual overtones in the pic overall. Clearly explicit.

sgcdonmai said:
Nipples, dick, balls - all visible, with some extremely sexual overtones in the pic overall. Clearly explicit.

Not at all explicit. The penis is mostly covered, there's no action going on, and overtones only make it questionable. Explicit needs to be explicit, not merely suggestive.

If by "mostly covered", you mean "glans not shown", then maybe. However, that's not the case.

What? Doesn't parse.

Through the cloth, you can see the entire shape of it. Moreover, the only part of that dick that the cloth covers is the head. The rest of the shaft, and all of the sack that would be feasibly visible from this angle, is clearly seen.

That, plus the nipples, the undressing by another party, the overall sexual overtone, they push it over the line.

My inner jury's still out on whether it's shota or not.

sgcdonmai said:
Through the cloth, you can see the entire shape of it. Moreover, the only part of that dick that the cloth covers is the head. The rest of the shaft, and all of the sack that would be feasibly visible from this angle, is clearly seen.

That, plus the nipples, the undressing by another party, the overall sexual overtone, they push it over the line.

Those are overtones. Rating:e is not for overtones, it's for when somebody is jamming it in.

post #868345

Bare breasts are only q, but the act of nipple tweak in full view and both of them are engaging in sexual act (not joking around) should be e IMHO. So what should it be?

Q

Yeah, questionable.

post #887134

Not sure is this should stay as Questionable, but also I have no basic to change it to explicit as there's no pussy juices or any other explicit content.

Definitely questionable. There's nothing explicit shown.

post #890589
post #890584

In both pictures girls masturbate whereas they wear underwear, so no vagina or breasts are shown. Just in case rated both as explicit, but if you decide so it may fall under questionable category.

I would say Questionable. There are no genitals shown, and no pussy_juice that would push it over the edge.

It's pushing it a little, but yeah, Q.

post #516934
post #651130
post #204993

They are currently marked explicit but are much closer to questionable. Two of these posts already had their rating changed from e and then back to it so I want to confirm the rating before altering it.

First two are Q. Maybe people think it's E because of the pubic hair, but pubic hair alone does not make it E.

The last one I'm more conflicted on due to the pussy juice, but I would still say Q, since the pussy is suitably covered by the tail.

Pubic hair used to be sufficient to warrant an explicit rating, though that changed with the last round of redefinitions. It could be these ratings are held over from before then.