Posted under General
As I have finally got a round tuit and am reworking howto:rate, as promised in forum #31026, I'm making this thread to have a single place for people to ask about ratings they're not sure of. The same basic idea as the "loli check thread" in forum #33650.
The usual rules apply: link the images you want to consult about here, await feedback. Don't create new threads for this purpose, and keep this one on topic, if any discussion starts to stray, move it to a new thread.
Updated by Hillside Moose
A round tuit is something every man should have.
Dibs.
Probably just gone unnoticed until now but, just in case, sexy exposed waists are safe right?
> Also, Hazuki, how about including an examples part in the wiki page to guide users on some borderline cases?
Updated
Cyberia-Mix said:
post #283315
Probably just gone unnoticed until now but, just in case, sexy exposed waists are safe right?
I'd say so.
Cyberia-Mix said:
Dibs.Probably just gone unnoticed until now but, just in case, sexy exposed waists are safe right?
That's something you could reasonably show up in on the street, so yes.
> Also, Hazuki, how about including an examples part in the wiki page to guide users on some borderline cases?
As I mentioned in the original thread, yes, that's the plan. But I'm only doing drive-by forum check here, and won't have the time to do it properly until Friday or so. Please remind me if I forget.
post #469256
"Clearly non-sexual nudity → safe". Just unsure how non-sexual this one is considered.
Might serve as a good example to illustrate that part if so.
Cyberia-Mix said:
post #469256
"Clearly non-sexual nudity → safe". Just unsure how non-sexual this one is considered.
Might serve as a good example to illustrate that part if so.
Nipples are exposed. Stays questionable according to howto:rate.
Ars said:
Nipples are exposed. Stays questionable according to howto:rate.
Ehh, that's not "exposed". Nudity involves being nude, y'know. It's obviously non-sexual, so safe.
post #69916
It was rated as Explicit, but I just changed it to rating:q, as per howto:rate, it seems it would actually fall into the Questionable rating category.
Just wanna get a second opionion on that.
葉月 said:
Ehh, that's not "exposed". Nudity involves being nude, y'know. It's obviously non-sexual, so safe.
Geh. I'll never be able to wrap my head around this. It confuses me as much as rating visible female genitalia as questionable. :/
[Edit]To stay on topic: post #643058
Ars said: post #643058
I'd say it's definitely questionable, as it has sexual overtones.
This new system confuses me too, I'd have placed post #643058 pretty firmly in safe, and consider it borderline safe/questionable at worst.
Shinjidude said: This new system confuses me too, I'd have placed post #643058 pretty firmly in safe, and consider it borderline safe/questionable at worst.
On second thought, I probably would too. While it does have a bit of a sexual overtone to it, it isn't exactly sexually charged, and it also appears to be rather tasteful as well, IMO.
Very borderline, indeed.
I'd say it's enough to be Questionable, albeit just barely. The pose, and the way the shirt is kinda sliding off, plus the general composition of the picture all add something of a sexual undertone to it.
I still think the exposed nipples in post #469256 add enough of a sexual tone to gain the Q-rating. Most of what I'd call "non-sexual nudity" omits details such as nipples and genitalia.
Something weird happened with post #468060.
The tag history says I changed the rating from s to q, but the rating was q already when I started editing the post. Another case of posts changing ratings with no trace in the history. Anybody knows the reason?
While we're at it, how should that post be rated?
Hazuki set it to s, but maybe he's the one who set it back to q after that. Both s and q seem fine to me so I don't know.
Also, post #359651 is a bit loli-ish but not enough to warrant a q rating imho.
post #468060: Presence of areola (especially in that context) would make me tag it "questionable"
post #359651 is "safe" in my opinion.
