post #9135182 The source contains ai-generated works, but they have work from pre-ai, and appear to be a 3d modeler?
Can't see a single thing that looks non-generated on that pixiv other then pixiv #101419081 and even then having it on their pixiv doesn't mean they drew it. Could've been a commission or a third-party edit. The low resolution of pixiv #101419062 also makes me think it's just an edit of some kind. Back to the original post, the weird crosses, eyes, eyebrows, hair, pretty much everything makes me certain that it's an unedited AI output.
your evidence is solid, I don't think such famous artist would use AI. However, I can't definitely say this image in particular has no AI involvement... the color is very AI-like, and it's much flashier than her usual art. Here are some spots that I'm just not convinced it's not AI https://i.imgur.com/jOPJTwN.jpeg and the knees. Could be the only time she tried AI and stopped.
your evidence is solid, I don't think such famous artist would use AI. However, I can't definitely say this image in particular has no AI involvement... the color is very AI-like, and it's much flashier than her usual art. Here are some spots that I'm just not convinced it's not AI https://i.imgur.com/jOPJTwN.jpeg and the knees. Could be the only time she tried AI and stopped.
Sorry, it was a little joke. A dear friend called roughs "counter-evidence" ignoring my saying "it is easy to copy AI works and make some roughs." I thought they would love araizumi_rui's case so I simply shared it. If you see araizumi_rui's extremely AI-like artworks and find their layers (including roughs) later, here are possible cases: A. You believe the artist painted on the base of AI works, and showed the roughs to pretend they were not AI-generated/AI-assisted B. You thought those works were AI-generated/AI-assisted, but you thought you were wrong after finding those roughs C. You never thought the those works were AI-generated/AI-assisted Now you should know there could be roughs for extremely AI-like artworks, unless you are case C.
As someone already mentioned in post #9140328, I suspect that some of this artist's later works (as seen on Pixiv) might have AI involved. This is made quite apparent with the inconsistent style in their recent works.
Is anything stopping someone who wants to pass AI art off as human-created art from using different frames from this model and overlaying them as the layers? https://lllyasviel.github.io/pages/paints_undo/ It seems like it would be easier than creating roughs, except for the the very bottom layer he shows, which I think is simple enough that most people could draw without issue.
Can anyone confirm if post #9081545 is an AI generated image? I'm suspicious since the artist is very open about using AI and looking at his account he seems to have a plethora of AI generated images that may or may not have been touched up with photoshop, which the post in question seems similar to.
Can anyone confirm if post #9081545 is an AI generated image? I'm suspicious since the artist is very open about using AI and looking at his account he seems to have a plethora of AI generated images that may or may not have been touched up with photoshop, which the post in question seems similar to.
They write "ai×photoshop" in their Twitter bio and that should mean those images are AI-generated then edited by photoshop
