https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8434109
Would child fit here?
Posted under Tags
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8434109
Would child fit here?
I am now trying to add a tag against the ouro_kronii posts with the chain on her head.
There are 2 candidate tags - chain_headband and chain_hairband.
chain_headband ouro_kronii
chain_hairband ouro_kronii
I don't find the differences between these examples. Which tag is more appropriate?
coveredby said:
I am now trying to add a tag against the ouro_kronii posts with the chain on her head.
There are 2 candidate tags - chain_headband and chain_hairband.
chain_headband ouro_kronii
chain_hairband ouro_kroniiI don't find the differences between these examples. Which tag is more appropriate?
It's supposed to be a headband, since it goes all around the front of the entire head rather than just on top.
Is it valid to add Miko Day to post #8951587 and post #8953331?
I know it's supposed to be as in shrine maiden day, but some Touhou fans are drawing the character Miko for the date.
So I was looking through injury, and came across deep_wound . Digging through that a bit, I notice a LARGE number of them do not meet the 'what you see, not what you know' criteria for tagging with this. I edited a few posts that were clearly the case, it seems a lot infer deep_wound as implicit to injury + larger quantities of blood but I think this runs afoul of the 'what you can see' caveat, since there is no per se deep_wound visible, posts such as this one, which I already removed it from post #6887351, yes he's holding a heart, and this implies a deep wound, but there is nothing visible. others, which I have not yet edited, which I left for now as example, but just want to get some consensus before I go ham on the tag and knock it from a good number of posts,
deep_wound
A particularly deep and/or wide injury that starts to reveal features beneath the surface of the skin
eg,
post #6852932 || marks on his body but nothing that is visually represents deep_wound
post #8950825 || I assume the tag refers to the character at the bottom , that is clearly bleeding, but again, nothing implying how the wiki defines the tag
post #8622300 || yeah, I'm not really sure how that tag ended up on this one.
post #8692474 || others are less obviously not deep_wound, but this has nothing but the implication, it is not visible, bloody yes, but not even a cut visible,
post #8372085 || its not a deep_wound, it is optimus prime, he's messed up, yeah, he has a candle burning down his chest, but...no deep_wound (can it even apply to robots? I'm unsure.
post #8159563 || again yes, I see she is wounded, yes, there's blood, but, also again, no deep_wound
post #8143155 || this one is another that is somewhat iffy, yes, the arrow is deep in the hole in her chest, but I am on the fence about this one, cos it doesn't just imply, it shows the injury, but it is not visible in the sense of the wiki's definition, it is implied, by the arrow in the surface hole, in the chest.
There's a lot more, this is just the first few pages of the posts with this tag.
as an example of what I think is proper usage here, such as these,
post #8078338 || Here we see blood, injury, and...a [deep_wound] in the neck where the possibly muscle can be seen beneath the skin, which does meet the criteria of the observed deep injury that reveals features beneath the skin
post #7281483 || something like this as well, the dragon has a deep_wound to the neck where beneath the skin is clearly visible in the laceration.
I mean there's lots that do well using it, it just seems commonly misplaced. Anyhow, just wanted some input.
Updated
Is this green hair, rather than black?
Do we have a tag for what the purple fox is holding?
post #8959795
Does the cow-and-dolphin meme have a tag, or even a specific name on the internet? I first remember it from a macro subtitled with "talk about a what the heck moment", but it seems to have expanded broadly in usage and scope since.
post #8143659 post #4356817
How to tag holding object or weapon with/between elbows like these?
Should these count holding or elbow carry?
Does this count as an off-shoulder dress? Sleeves are clearly meant to not be on the shoulders, but those straps are what's throwing me off.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
Does this count as an off-shoulder dress? Sleeves are clearly meant to not be on the shoulders, but those straps are what's throwing me off.
Yes. Some of the 'correct examples' that are provided have straps. The criteria is that the sleeves are present, not detached, and the shoulders are left bare without it being an example of a shoulder cutout.
definitelysleeping said:
Yes. Some of the 'correct examples' that are provided have straps. The criteria is that the sleeves are present, not detached, and the shoulders are left bare without it being an example of a shoulder cutout.
Alright, sounds good. Thought it was, but I wanted to make sure before adding the tag. Thanks.
So with post #8950028, what would you tag what's wrapped around her leg?
post #8966646
Is there a name for this background pattern?