ANON_TOKYO said:
BUR #36442 is pending approval.
mass update pool:24582 -> char:mortis_(persona)_(bang_dream!)
mass update mortis_(bang_dream!) -pool:24582 -> char:mortis_(costume)_(bang_dream!)
nuke pool:24582
create implication mortis_(persona)_(bang_dream!) -> mortis_(bang_dream!)
create implication mortis_(costume)_(bang_dream!) -> mortis_(bang_dream!)
create implication mortis_(doll)_(bang_dream!) -> mortis_(bang_dream!)
As above. This allows for a bunch of worthwhile 2-tag searches while still encompassing all the option shown in the table above, plus I think it also makes a certain degree of intuitive sense for someone not familiar with our tagging procedures (despite it being a deeper implication tree).
My proposal has the benefit of simplicity: 1 main tag with three subtags. The downside is that there's certain reasonable concepts (normal Mutsumi, i.e. the first row of my chart; non-normal Mutsumi, i.e. any of costume, outfit, doll) are very awkward to search for Builders, and outright unsearchable by blue names.
Your latest BUR has the upside that "normal Mutsumi" and "non-normal Mutsumi" are searchable with one or two tags. The downside is that this now requires a three-tier hierarchy with a fifth umbrella tag in the middle.
Honestly, I'm fine with either. If anything a slight preference for yours. They're both kinda ugly but some ugliness will be required if we want to maintain searchability of all the things fans will want to search for.
