Twitter account is way too new and Pixiv account has a few posts despite its age.
Updated
Posted under General
Twitter account is way too new and Pixiv account has a few posts despite its age.
Updated
MaskedAvenger said:
Twitter account is way too new and Pixiv account as a few posts.
Their fanbox is restricted, which is something I've noticed being a pattern for other AI artists (and probably why they end up on Patreon instead). I don't know if that's like, an actual consistent Pixiv policy or something, but it's notable.
id:>4175116 batiao_zhai AI-assisted?
artist #206460 has deleted all their posts on social media.
People on Weibo have accused them of using AI:
artist #492018
Their art may be AI? Looking at post #8616092, there seems to be some inconsistencies in the hair.
post #8696695
Here's an other one.
ion288 said:
post #8696695
Here's an other one.
Profile says "Nai + PS", that's code for posting slop. Also the wiki.
I want to see if this is actually AI, since I see zero artifacts (and the flag mentioned hands, but it just looks like the knuckles poking out was mistaken for a sign of AI).
hasu_no_kougeki said:
I want to see if this is actually AI, since I see zero artifacts (and the flag mentioned hands, but it just looks like the knuckles poking out was mistaken for a sign of AI).
To be honest this artist has my slop detector going off left right and center, but purely for the shading. It may just be a case of extremely unlucky artstyle (it has happened before), but I personally don't really buy it, given their start date (december 2023) and pretty high volume of posts, especially at the start. I'm surprised they haven't gotten more flags
</rant>
I think this artist is a case of AI-assisted. There's no obvious artifacts or issues, and there actually appears to be brushwork, but the extremely shiny shading just feels wrong. Touched up? Traced/redrawn? Filter? Unsure.
The hand argument is bullshit though.
Sure, the shading does seem sus, but that's about all I could see that was. Nevermind the fact they apparently have actual drawing experience from 5 years ago (id:<=3694461 raiden_(kdsn3783)).
https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets/24520905
I'm having just a little bit of doubt. Can someone check this one?
Artist here: https://x.com/Luna11054
post #8683916
An other day an other tagless flag.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=admiral_reign&z=1
There's nothing super telling about this artist but the lack of social media interaction despite the shockingly high quality art is very, weird. Their Pixiv account is also pretty darn dead.
Nothing outright damning but kinda odd.
AI, right? I can feel alarm bells going off, but can't place my finger exactly on what...
What about this artist?
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/112009238
Doesn't exist on Danbooru and there is nothing mentioning AI, but looking at the art and the upload dates sets off all kinds of alarm bells, but I can't say with 100% certainty.
matteste said:
What about this artist?
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/112009238
Doesn't exist on Danbooru and there is nothing mentioning AI, but looking at the art and the upload dates sets off all kinds of alarm bells, but I can't say with 100% certainty.
Definitely AI.
post #8708067
"The artist would like to stay anonymous...". Yeah, sure.
Hair seems growing at a strange angles. Anklets doesn't look like they completely circular. Her gloves reaches past elbows on one view and don't do that on another.
On the other hand the left half of her haircut is simply copypasted from backview to frontal. Only human can be that lazy.
post #8638331
Missing tag or false flag?
ion288 said:
post #8638331
Missing tag or false flag?
Their twitter has lineart WIPS (twitter #1865621112710967432 -> twitter #1866033769381294152), which either means it's 1) a false flag 2) uploading both AI-gen and original/AI-assisted or 3) impressive commitment to the bit
Ylimegirl said:
Their twitter has lineart WIPS (twitter #1865621112710967432 -> twitter #1866033769381294152), which either means it's 1) a false flag 2) uploading both AI-gen and original/AI-assisted or 3) impressive commitment to the bit
AI has been able to make such WIPs for ages, they tell us nothing. The style doesn't look particularly "AI-y" to me though.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
AI, right? I can feel alarm bells going off, but can't place my finger exactly on what...
Blurred and inconsistent eyes, missing finger, strange and melted-looking ribbon, a single asymmetrical wing broken in half between the bg and foreground. The repost account is transparent about posting AI, so they probably just forgot to tag this one.
nkuylo said:
post #8708067
"The artist would like to stay anonymous...". Yeah, sure.
Hair seems growing at a strange angles. Anklets doesn't look like they completely circular. Her gloves reaches past elbows on one view and don't do that on another.
On the other hand the left half of her haircut is simply copypasted from backview to frontal. Only human can be that lazy.
If you zoom in you can also see the (jaggy and very inconsistent with the rest of the image) lines of what appears to be manual editing around the heart-shaped gem, tassels, hair streaks and sash patterns. I think AI-assisted.
ion288 said:
post #8638331
Missing tag or false flag?
Most of the brushwork looks human. It is also very stiff, janky, and amateur in a way that's completely incongruous with the images' level of proficiency in anatomy and rendering, so that's tracing 101, most likely from AI considering the poses and subject matter.