Damian0358 said:
BUR #33681 has been rejected.
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_1.0) -> mint_fantome
rename mint_fantome_(minto_1.0) -> mint_fantome_(old_design)
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_2.0) -> mint_fantome
rename mint_fantome_(minto_2.0) -> mint_fantome_(1st_costume)Alt-proposal per my comments in forum #316966.
No, I mean that the "old design" is the first costume. And minto 2.0 is the second costume. You're just making it confusing for everyone if you call the 1.0 "old design" and 2.0 "first costume". The tag name itself is contradicting you. They're literally called 1.0 and 2.0.