Posted under Tags
TheGamingRodent said:
BUR #33097 has been rejected.
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_1.0) -> mint_fantome
create alias mint_fantome_(old_design) -> mint_fantome_(minto_1.0)
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_2.0) -> mint_fantome
create alias mint_fantome_(1st_costume) -> mint_fantome_(minto_2.0)Adding implications and aliasing Mint's old and current outfits.
I really don't like making an alias from "1st costume" to the second costume.
The bulk update request #33118 (forum #317036) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33133 (forum #317085) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33200 (forum #317329) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33405 (forum #317981) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33505 (forum #318352) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33578 (forum #318618) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33581 (forum #318629) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33628 (forum #318799) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
tensepelican said:
BUR #33642 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication hiodoshi_ao_(1st_costume) -> hiodoshi_ao
create implication ichijou_ririka_(1st_costume) -> ichijou_ririka
create implication juufuutei_raden_(1st_costume) -> juufuutei_raden
create implication otonose_kanade_(1st_costume) -> otonose_kanade
create implication todoroki_hajime_(1st_costume) -> todoroki_hajimeAdding implications for the 1st costumes of dev_is
These tags are already in use, would just make the process easier
I believe we're currently waiting to see if ReGloss will get either a New Years outfit or if they're Unit Costumes will be there current 2nd outfits before we make a bur for there 1st costumes.
TheGamingRodent said:
I believe we're currently waiting to see if ReGloss will get either a New Years outfit or if they're Unit Costumes will be there current 2nd outfits before we make a bur for there 1st costumes.
Sorry but I'm a teeny bit confused at the response >.<
The 1st_costume tags are already in use & multiple pages are filled with their default outfit
The tags just aren't linked to the vtuber
For example, I noticed that post #8255907 was tagged with otonose_kanade_(1st_costume) but not otonose_kanade.. shouldn't those two be linked so it doesn't happen again? (i did fix that post already)
If another costume comes out, wouldn't that be a different tag? I'm unsure of how that effects the already existing 1st_costume being linked to the tubers
tensepelican said:
Sorry but I'm a teeny bit confused at the response >.<
The 1st_costume tags are already in use & multiple pages are filled with their default outfit
The tags just aren't linked to the vtuber
For example, I noticed that post #8255907 was tagged with otonose_kanade_(1st_costume) but not otonose_kanade.. shouldn't those two be linked so it doesn't happen again? (i did fix that post already)
If another costume comes out, wouldn't that be a different tag? I'm unsure of how that effects the already existing 1st_costume being linked to the tubers
Not that confusing, it's like I said, we're just waiting for new outfits to be announced for ReGloss and Justice at the moment, which is more then likely gonna be their New Years outfits, also tagging with their _(1st_cotumes) is OK, even if they aren't implied to them yet to make finding those outfits easier amongst other alternate costumes (ie non-official ones), also on that image I don't see Kanade anywhere in there
Updated
BUR #33664 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication pillowdear_(old_design) -> pillowdear
create implication pillowdear_(1st_costume) -> pillowdear
create implication pillowdear_(2nd_costume) -> pillowdear
Adding implications for PillowDear's costumes.
alphashitlord said:
BUR #33664 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication pillowdear_(old_design) -> pillowdear
create implication pillowdear_(1st_costume) -> pillowdear
create implication pillowdear_(2nd_costume) -> pillowdearAdding implications for PillowDear's costumes.
Beat me to it, thank you for your help earlier.
BUR #33679 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication tachibana_hinano_(1st_costume) -> tachibana_hinano_(vtuber)
create implication tachibana_hinano_(2nd_costume) -> tachibana_hinano_(vtuber)
create implication tachibana_hinano_(3rd_costume) -> tachibana_hinano_(vtuber)
create implication tachibana_hinano_(4th_costume) -> tachibana_hinano_(vtuber)
create implication tachibana_hinano_(5th_costume) -> tachibana_hinano_(vtuber)
Getting around to the Hinano implications.
Still wish we got rid of the "_(vtuber)" side before this, but it stayed.
Updated
BUR #33681 has been rejected.
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_1.0) -> mint_fantome
rename mint_fantome_(minto_1.0) -> mint_fantome_(old_design)
create implication mint_fantome_(minto_2.0) -> mint_fantome
rename mint_fantome_(minto_2.0) -> mint_fantome_(1st_costume)
nonamethanks said:
I really don't like making an alias from "1st costume" to the second costume.
Alt-proposal per my comments in forum #316966.
BUR #33682 has been rejected.
create alias miori_celesta_(miori_1.0) -> miori_celesta_(old_design)
create alias miori_celesta_(miori_2.0) -> miori_celesta_(casual)
create alias miori_celesta_(miori_3.0) -> miori_celesta_(comfy)
create alias miori_celesta_(miori_4.0) -> miori_celesta_(guildmaster)
Utility alias per suggestions in forum #317104.
The bulk update request #33642 (forum #318839) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33664 (forum #318960) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33679 (forum #319005) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
