ion288 said:
post #8401697 accused of being AI by an approver, though for once not flagged ☺
Literally says so in the artist's bio
Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #8401697 accused of being AI by an approver, though for once not flagged ☺
Literally says so in the artist's bio
https://cdn.donmai.us/original/10/3d/103d608fbb8c0129ddd8678662f7b44b.png
Artist: https://www.pixiv.net/users/58873830
Can someone take a look to see if these are AI?
post #8403390 And the source's gallery feels like AI.
Freshblink said:
https://cdn.donmai.us/original/10/3d/103d608fbb8c0129ddd8678662f7b44b.png
Artist: https://www.pixiv.net/users/58873830
Can someone take a look to see if these are AI?
Not only are those really obvious AI(you can also check manually pretty easily with this site, which, while it can give false negatives, pretty much doesn't give false positives(it's based on noise patterns)), if you take any two of their 'works' and overlay the signatures they are 100% identical - meaning they have the signature as a png that they'll just overlay with photoshop or some other app. Though they do seem to have... occasionally sometimes rotated them(or scaled down the image), the easiest to get this comparison is with the frieren and emilia since there's no rotation or scale difference.
https://x.com/takeez3/status/1854834340896948683
https://x.com/takeez3/status/1855223638531985871
Could these be...? What caught my eye was Kasen's left sidelock on the first one and the hair strands look really messy on the second (mainly on the area above the bandaged hand).
EDIT: Just looked at the rest of their media tab, definitely AI.
Updated
So I just found this artist that does Yuri art. However, this artist profile has the word "AI" with no context. So I'm not sure if this artist uses AI images or they can draw but use AI for assisting. Your thoughts?
fsnfanboy said:
So I just found this artist that does Yuri art. However, this artist profile has the word "AI" with no context. So I'm not sure if this artist uses AI images or they can draw but use AI for assisting. Your thoughts?
They seem fishy, I wouldn't recommend uploading from them.
fsnfanboy said:
So I just found this artist that does Yuri art. However, this artist profile has the word "AI" with no context. So I'm not sure if this artist uses AI images or they can draw but use AI for assisting. Your thoughts?
The profile says "AI + retouch," so at first glance that would be ai-assisted. There's still quite a bit of nonsense in that image you linked, though, so it might as well be ai-generated.
I suspect this is AI, or at the very least possibly stolen artwork; the two sides of this dakimakura don't quite match in terms of style and, well, it's from a listing of a dakimakura, and you know how scammers can be with scraping things with bots.
post #8145761
Flagg but no tag.
ion288 said:
post #8145761
Flagg but no tag.
Did you realize tagging reveals who flagged it?
Freshblink said:
Did you realize tagging reveals who flagged it?
If you're confident enough to flag something for AI then there's no reason for you to be anonymous on the matter.
That post doesn't seem AI-generated to me. Look at the lines on the blush, the brushstrokes on the wooden wall and beams (you can see the lineart behind the green coloring for the bushes), the hairclips etc.
A Google translation of the artist states they:
"I create image generation AI, mainly for Blue Archive, Star Rail, and Genshin Impact."
Freshblink said:
Did you realize tagging reveals who flagged it?
Im not demanding that the flagger has to tag it, but someone needs to. Thus I raise the issue in this thread.
I'll even do the tagging if someone here can say it is indeed AI but there are members that think its AI when they see some smudged colour or poorly drawn hands.
Anyway, post #7188131 and the other posts by sugata lai are accused of being AI. Can anyone here corroborate this?
ion288 said:
Im not demanding that the flagger has to tag it, but someone needs to. Thus I raise the issue in this thread.
I'll even do the tagging if someone here can say it is indeed AI but there are members that think its AI when they see some smudged colour or poorly drawn hands.
Anyway, post #7188131 and the other posts by sugata lai are accused of being AI. Can anyone here corroborate this?
https://twitter.com/Sugata_LAi/status/1741352738141671582
Hand in this one is just all sorts of fucked. The fact that they literally put AI in their name and started posting sameish quality "popular" stuff is a pretty common approach for people just there to post AI stuff. I don't have much trouble believing the flagger is right.
ion288 said:
Im not demanding that the flagger has to tag it, but someone needs to. Thus I raise the issue in this thread.
I'll even do the tagging if someone here can say it is indeed AI but there are members that think its AI when they see some smudged colour or poorly drawn hands.
Anyway, post #7188131 and the other posts by sugata lai are accused of being AI. Can anyone here corroborate this?
I don't see how any of their works are AI at all
- Hi-res image with no artifacts
- Quality is pretty good but not professional level
- You can very clearly see the brush strokes
- Some human error on post #7188131 , the shirt's lineart overlapped with the octopus and the octopus overlapped with the foot (Seems like the layers weren’t clipped or arranged properly)
ANON_TOKYO said:
https://twitter.com/Sugata_LAi/status/1741352738141671582
The fact that they literally put AI in their name
Maybe because their pen name is ライ?
ANON_TOKYO said:
https://twitter.com/Sugata_LAi/status/1741352738141671582
Hand in this one is just all sorts of fucked. The fact that they literally put AI in their name and started posting sameish quality "popular" stuff is a pretty common approach for people just there to post AI stuff. I don't have much trouble believing the flagger is right.
That's a "fucked" hand to you?
No wonder people are complaining about approvals...
post #8398107
An other one.
post #8337534
Flagged for "possibly AI slop"...
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8426478
Reference is an AI image not a photo, so should be ai-assisted not photo-referenced.