Posted under General
HyphenSam said:
Anatomy of the left leg is very bad.
I don't think the issues mentioned by the moderator are significant flaws in the image. As evidence, it has received 49 scores and 50 favorites. Additionally, there are images on this site with anatomical flaws, such as the one with the upper arm being excessively long like a noodle.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8131154
I kindly request that you review the moderator's opinion again and reconsider the decision.
Updated
nickname1190 said:
As evidence, it has received 49 scores and 50 favorites.
Score does not factor into approvability.
nickname1190 said:
Additionally, there are images on this site with anatomical flaws, such as the one with the upper arm being excessively long like a noodle.
"Other images are bad too" is not a valid argument. If you think they're bad, flag them. I can see your point about the arms being a bit too long but I don't think it's bad. But of course you are free to flag it.
Your post in comparison isn't the same. The left leg looks very very bad. I don't think human legs can twist like that.
HyphenSam said:
Score does not factor into approvability.
"Other images are bad too" is not a valid argument. If you think they're bad, flag them. I can see your point about the arms being a bit too long but I don't think it's bad. But of course you are free to flag it.
Your post in comparison isn't the same. The left leg looks very very bad. I don't think human legs can twist like that.
I believe it's possible. Women tend to have greater flexibility than men, and with that increased flexibility, unimaginable things become possible.
https://giphy.com/gifs/ztvJ8NH4qdX8I
https://indie88.com/who-is-the-most-flexible-person-in-the-world/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHp1wDgxE44&pp=ygUTTW9zdCBGbGV4aWJsZSBXb21hbg%3D%3D
If it's possible in the real world, why can't it be a bit more exaggerated in the anime world?
nickname1190 said:
it has received 49 scores and 50 favorites.
By the way, I just want you to know: porn and erotics ALWAYS get a lot of upvotes, even if they break the rules (AI) or are drawn extremely terribly, but the quality is slightly higher than MS Paint. Unfortunately, most of regular users on the site have an excessive "addiction" to r34 of any kind.
nickname1190 said:
I believe it's possible. Women tend to have greater flexibility than men, and with that increased flexibility, unimaginable things become possible.
https://giphy.com/gifs/ztvJ8NH4qdX8I
https://indie88.com/who-is-the-most-flexible-person-in-the-world/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHp1wDgxE44&pp=ygUTTW9zdCBGbGV4aWJsZSBXb21hbg%3D%3D
If it's possible in the real world, why can't it be a bit more exaggerated in the anime world?
Just because there's someone that can *potentially* do it doesn't mean it doesn't look weird to us. Hell, the people that can do it are of interest in part because it looks weird. And if it looks weird, it's less likely to get approved, that's just how it is.
nickname1190 said:
I believe it's possible. Women tend to have greater flexibility than men, and with that increased flexibility, unimaginable things become possible.
...
If it's possible in the real world, why can't it be a bit more exaggerated in the anime world?
I've sure posts like post #7626895 are possible where women with broken spines can twist their torso like that, but that doesn't make the art look any better. You're not going to handwave any bad_anatomy post with "it's possible in real life".
As someone who originally had this misconception about the approval system during my early days of uploading: posts are approved on their own merit. Other posts on this site don't influence your own's approvability; that's why we have appeals and flagging as a community check on the content that's on the site. Doesn't matter if it's possible in real life or whatever. If one approver doesn't like the post, it won't get approved.
This thread isn't for debating an approver's personal reasons for disliking the post or if there's an objectively erroneous part of the image. You have your chance through appeals and this thread's for trying to get feedback on why your post might've been deleted so you can pay attention to that factor in the future.
why was post #8092982 deleted? looks good to me
post #8116383
post #8116384
Part of a set. Identical to the other two images in the set (post #8116381; post #8116382) which did get approved in short order except for Yanase being pregnant. Any reason? I don't think pregnancy's too extreme for this site.
Narrator-1 said:
I don't think pregnancy's too extreme for this site.
While that's true, according to The Upload Rules, extreme/unusual fetishes fall under the Borderline Content category; I assume pregnancy can be considered an unusual fetish at least, so I guess Approvers can give the luxury to be picky with that kind of content.
Personally, I suggest you to not upload Borderline Content here unless you have a Contributor+ rank, because it'll likely be deleted.
Not sure why these were not approved in light of similar being approved:
Mayhem-Chan said:
If your upload's original source is no longer available:
- if you still have the link somewhere, you should still provide it in the source field, along with bad id.
- if you don't have the original link, you should still indicate that there was one and that it's no longer available, in a more direct and explicit way than just adding bad id; for example if the source is a deleted tweet, then just put "deleted tweet" in the source field, that's already infinitely better than just leaving it empty, and approvers are already less likely to avoid your post.
I no longer have original link, but picture was originally posted in one of galleries at Author's deleted Fanbox. What I should write in the source to avoid any possible misunderstandings? Since Author gave her approval in pictures being shared elsewhere "within reason" before she left internet.
post #7931799
post #8106072
post #8106083
post #8105610
post #8105815
Can someone check these posts again?
BUR #31189 has been rejected.
create alias higgly.town.hero -> higgly_(higburger)
rename higgly_(higburger) -> higgly
Aliasing same artist together and then renaming to the most common name.
EDIT: ...Wrong thread, woops
The bulk update request #31189 (forum #306083) has been rejected by @Trouble_Windows.
otakuman007 said:
I no longer have original link, but picture was originally posted in one of galleries at Author's deleted Fanbox. What I should write in the source to avoid any possible misunderstandings? Since Author gave her approval in pictures being shared elsewhere "within reason" before she left internet.
I already gave the answer in my previous message
I dont understand why post #8125393 is deleted, when other arts in same style by same artist remain up.
