Posted under General
TokiTokiRom said:
This is the work of an author whose scores frequently exceed 100.
post #8013029
I found 10 unposted pieces on Twitter and I posted them.
All were of consistent quality, but only the illustration above was not finally approved.
Score has no impact whatsoever on approval. In this specific case it's a somewhat fetish-y post, which often makes approval more difficult.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8062851?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3Amikuworld
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8071489?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3Amikuworld
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8055206?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3Amikuworld
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8055716?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3Amikuworld
miku?
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance. The quality of the images seems very decent to me.
post #7830131
post #6309708
Updated
What's wrong with these posts?
post #7371914
post #7264167
post #7136312
post #8084711
post #8073711
post #7880351
Updated
post #8089834
post #8086252
post #8089869 ←A shortened version of the approved post
check
Hi. Whats wrong with this one?
post #8088504
Curious what is wrong with this post?
post #8089671
what's is wrong whit this post? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8082048 for me, the quality in very decent.
Edit: and this other https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8073719
Need feedback on those (especially confused for the two firsts)
post #8095226
post #6322525
post #8096726
I'd appreciate feedback on these two:
Pretty much everything else by the artist has been uploaded and approved, and the quality didn't seem noticeably different to my eye, so I was pretty surprised they didn't make it.
Oh, come on! Why this was not approved?
I can't understand what are bad with these posts https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8094708 and https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8094787 maybe few approvers see they?
otakuman007 said:
Oh, come on! Why this was not approved?
It's missing a lot of tags and you are also missing the source link. Be sure to include that as that is also included is a part of the approval process!
- post #5093823
Kinda remembered about this one recently, so I'm giving it a try to get a feedback on it.
Got unapproved twice, despite being a find-the-7-differences between it and post #5093819, which is already approved. Most of the important tags are already there, so I fail to understand why it was unapproved.
This is a high-resolution version of an approved submission. Source: pixiv.Someone please approve this work.
post #8100787
this post：908 KB .jpg (1032x1457)
original：233 KB .jpg (800x1130)
Thank you for the approval!
Updated
argentb said:
It's missing a lot of tags and you are also missing the source link. Be sure to include that as that is also included is a part of the approval process!
It's pretty rare for a good post to go unapproved because of tags, however the missing source link will make most if not all approvers hesitate.
argentb said:
It's missing a lot of tags and you are also missing the source link. Be sure to include that as that is also included is a part of the approval process!
Unfortunately, original source link no longer exists. Which is why I added bad_ID tag. As for tags. How many of them do you want to add?
