BUR #25941 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias hai_mao -> lowlight_kirilenko
create alias hai_mao_(character) -> lowlight_kirilenko_(character)
Utility aliases
Posted under Tags
BUR #25941 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias hai_mao -> lowlight_kirilenko
create alias hai_mao_(character) -> lowlight_kirilenko_(character)
Utility aliases
The bulk update request #25941 (forum #279533) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #25687 (forum #278760) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #25830 (forum #279118) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Login_to_view said:
That aside, I'm not sure how to tackle this. I think w_(wis'adel)_(arknights), despite following the standards, is a worse idea.
We don't follow the qualifier standard for other alters either, we just use the name as displayed in game. No reason to impose the standard on this one.
Login_to_view said:
Do note that (because W loves chaos) the correct spelling is Wiš'adel, so if we want to follow the steps of pozyomka_(arknights), we'll probably want to figure out the correct way to spell it without accents.
That'd end up being Wish'adel, no?
BUR #26841 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication ines_(under_the_flaming_dome)_(arknights) -> ines_(arknights)
create implication penance_(scribing)_(arknights) -> penance_(arknights)
create implication silence_the_paradigmatic_(habitat)_(arknights) -> silence_the_paradigmatic_(arknights)
create implication meteor_(gwiazdcytrony)_(arknights) -> meteor_(arknights)
create implication muelsyse_(young_branch)_(arknights) -> muelsyse_(arknights)
create implication blue_poison_(nocturne_of_elysia)_(arknights) -> blue_poison_(arknights)
create implication skadi_the_corrupting_heart_(red_countress)_(arknights) -> skadi_the_corrupting_heart_(arknights)
create implication gladiia_(i_am_the_tides)_(arknights) -> gladiia_(arknights)
Missing skin implications.
The bulk update request #25832 (forum #279121) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #26841 (forum #283092) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #27723 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication goldenglow_(party_in_the_garden)_(arknights) -> goldenglow_(arknights)
create implication u-official_(stream_above_the_clouds)_(arknights) -> u-official_(arknights)
create implication lee_(remedy_in_a_cup_of_leung_cha)_(arknights) -> lee_(arknights)
Sanrio collab skin implications.
The bulk update request #27723 (forum #286315) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #28599 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication swire_the_elegant_wit_(rhythmic_blocks)_(arknights) -> swire_the_elegant_wit_(arknights)
create implication silverash_(never-melting_ice)_(arknights) -> silverash_(arknights)
create implication reed_the_flame_shadow_(summer_flowers)_(arknights) -> reed_the_flame_shadow_(arknights)
create implication typhon_(temperature_difference)_(arknights) -> typhon_(arknights)
create implication grain_buds_(fragrant_pace)_(arknights) -> grain_buds_(arknights)
rename hoshiguma_(seeker_sk97)_(arknights) -> hoshiguma_(seeker)_(arknights)
create implication hoshiguma_(seeker)_(arknights) -> hoshiguma_(arknights)
create implication insider_(sweet_jackpot)_(arknights) -> insider_(arknights)
Random assortment of unimplicated skins. The other new summer ones don't have uploads yet. The Hoshiguma skin should match our naming convention of the other summer skins.
Edit: Missed one.
Cinnamon_Toast said:
The Hoshiguma skin should match our naming convention of the other summer skins.
Isn't the convention that the skin names match the official name? Looking at post #7673156, that's what the skin is called.
nonamethanks said:
Isn't the convention that the skin names match the official name? Looking at post #7673156, that's what the skin is called.
I guess we skip the serial numbers(?), eg these other skins
nonamethanks said:
Isn't the convention that the skin names match the official name? Looking at post #7673156, that's what the skin is called.
Yes, we skip the numbers for whatever reason. See also this BUR from a few months ago: forum #260203
Personally, I don't have strong feelings about it either way, but if we want the numbers back we'll have to alias all the other summer skins too, which will take me a minute because I don't know them off the top of my head.
BUR #28720 has been rejected.
create implication arene_(dangerous_invitation)_(arknights) -> arene_(arknights)
create implication qiubai_(courtesy)_(arknights) -> qiubai_(arknights)
create implication cement_(new_business)_(arknights) -> cement_(arknights)
create implication corroserum_(leisure)_(arknights) -> corroserum_(arknights)
create implication amiya_(swimsuit)_(arknights) -> amiya_(arknights)
create implication amiya_(act_2)_(arknights) -> amiya_(arknights)
create implication totter_(shimmering_dew)_(arknights) -> totter_(arknights)
create implication melanite_(for_the_banquet)_(arknights) -> melanite_(arknights)
create implication earthspirit_(major_field)_(arknights) -> earthspirit_(arknights)
create implication proviso_(holiday)_(arknights) -> proviso_(arknights)
create implication lava_(a_ray_of_sunshine)_(arknights) -> lava_(arknights)
create implication catapult_(holiday)_(arknights) -> catapult_(arknights)
create implication savage_(three_hundred_meters_underground)_(arknights) -> savage_(arknights)
create implication purestream_(yearly_present)_(arknights) -> purestream_(arknights)
create implication flamebringer_(one_blade)_(arknights) -> flamebringer_(arknights)
create implication ela_(safehouse)_(rainbow_six_siege) -> ela_(rainbow_six_siege)
create implication doc_(exhibition)_(rainbow_six_siege) -> doc_(rainbow_six_siege)
rename iana_(rainbow_six) -> iana_(rainbow_six_siege)
rename iana_(mirrormaze)_(rainbow_six) -> iana_(mirrormaze)_(rainbow_six_siege)
create implication iana_(mirrormaze)_(rainbow_six_siege) -> iana_(rainbow_six_siege)
deprecate whisperain_(after_summer_rain)_(arknights)
deprecate dusk_(bloom_moon)_(arknights)
deprecate female_tourist_a_(arknights)
create implication caper_(summer_flowers)_(arknights) -> caper_(arknights)
create implication nightingale_(iakhu_of_flows)_(arknights) -> nightingale_(arknights)
create implication eyjafjalla_the_hvit_aska_(a_picnic_before_a_long_trip)_(arknights) -> eyjafjalla_the_hvit_aska_(arknights)
create implication poncirus_(to_rest_in_night_breezes)_(arknights) -> poncirus_(arknights)
create implication weedy_(sedjem)_(arknights) -> weedy_(arknights)
create implication irene_(the_adjudicatrix_and_her_resolve)_(arknights) -> irene_(arknights)
create implication ptilopsis_(amongst_the_clouds)_(arknights) -> ptilopsis_(arknights)
I have combed through every Arknights characters and their skins to find which required implications. Even though she isn't technically an AK character, I've included the renaming of Iana and her skin out of consistency with the other R6S operators.
Lastly, I found two fanmade outfits for Dusk and Whisperain that were given a tag and were then implied along with the official skins. I don't see any reason for these two tags to exist, unless they had a lot of posts.
EDIT: Oops, the last implication is missing the "_siege" from the outfit tag.
EDIT 2: Following Dannk's comment, I reread the side story where "Female Tourist A" appears and they're right. I was mistakenly under the impression that it was Amiya's nickname. So I created the amiya_(swimsuit) tag accordingly and changed the BUR.
Although I think that female_tourist_a should not exist in the first place because it's used for a random generic NPC
Updated
heartattack said:
I guess we skip the serial numbers(?), eg these other skins
Well, as long as they don't start releasing skins with the same name where they only change the number... Though it's awfully confusing that we're randomly removing numbers like this.
The bulk update request #28599 (forum #293178) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
nonamethanks said:
Well, as long as they don't start releasing skins with the same name where they only change the number... Though it's awfully confusing that we're randomly removing numbers like this.
There are indeed several summer outfits with the same name (for example nearl_(shimmering_dew)_(arknights), platinum_(shimmering_dew)_(arknights) and carnelian_(shimmering_dew)_(arknights)), but I'd argue that adding a seemingly random series of characters would not help someone recognize which one belonged to which character. I don't think one would know that "Shimmering Dew SD01" is Nearl's and "Shimmering Dew SD05" is Platinum's.
Do note that only the outfits designed by the in-universe brand Coral Coast, which specializes in swimsuits, have this issue.
For further information, all of those outfits are listed here on the Wiki
If you're still not convinced, I can list all ~50 of them in a future BUR for a mass update.
Updated