gfz said:
A few things jumping out at me here:
Monk and Barbarian were both tagged on one image due to the commentary, but in all the stereotypes of D&D official art classes, it didn’t look like either. It was just a nude bara dude. Doesn’t even look like Goliath. The D&D classes shouldn’t be gentags at all. There’s no standard appearance in any video game or edition. And if there were, we’d probably tag that specific outfit as a chartag that we’d have to wrestle with every so often to purge canon tagging, much like Final Fantasy class tags. Landsknecht isn’t even a class or character in D&D, so I’m guessing it’s a case of someone overtagging.
On that note, Goliath probably doesn’t need to be a tag. It’s mostly one character who is just a big grey dude. The grey skin is the only tell of the race in modern D&D. The other characters tagged with the race just look like regular people. They’re not even particularly big or muscular.
Goliath’s defining feature is grey skin. That’s it. And half the tag doesn’t even have that.
gfz said:
A few things jumping out at me here:
- These dragon tags look like they're only being used for one person's OCs. I think they should be gentags with no qualifier + dragon girl.
Those personifications do incorporate the specific canon details from 3.5e Draconomicon, so they are undoubtably D&D dragons. I don’t think they should be qualifier-less as a result, lest someone try to go through and tag all of Rayquaza as green dragon.
