Blank_User said:
I'm not qualified to comment on the images themselves, but Approvers don't consider the score. It's possible for posts that don't meet quality standards to get high scores ...
Huh. I genuinely thought that approvers looked at the post's reception as a factor for whether or not to approve it. Thanks for clearing this up for me.
Blank_User said:
I've also seen ai-generated posts get positive scores even though they're against the rules. Conversely, some high quality art will go unnoticed and might never get a positive score.
I've noticed that happening with some AI posts too, yeah. Given how I figured the approval process worked, I thought that this was the result of the site's userbase outside of approvers being bad at identifying AI posts.