Why were these unapproved? The artworks are of very good quality, please
post #7044802
post #7044699
post #7044751
post #7044727
Posted under General
Why were these unapproved? The artworks are of very good quality, please
post #7044802
post #7044699
post #7044751
post #7044727
Hopefully third time's the charm.
Could someone explain to me what exactly is wrong with post #7031489? Because nothing stands out to me at all.
Woke up today to find the post approved, so I guess this has been resolved.
Updated
Feedback for these deleted arts, if nothing wrong, pls notice them
post #6966304
post #6966306
post #6966519
post #6966540
post #6968900
post #6969864
post #6970312
post #6968838
post #6973148
post #6982700
post #6985826
post #6987860
post #6990100
post #6990112
post #6997522
post #7003550
post #7007525
post #7029703
post #7032198
post #7039312
Updated
Can someone tell me why is post #7001593 considered "poor quality"? I don't want to argue, just want to know to be clear about things here...
I don't see any flaws here post #2872239
Nitramy said:
previous works of this artist was okayed, was wondering why post #6993720 seems to have been disapproved
need a follow-up here, this work seems to have slipped through the cracks, or the moderator that approved the previous posts of the artist wasn't present when this was posted
And this one? post #7060076. I'm starting to think it's user bias.
Not mine though it did fail an appeal I made. What's the issue with post #3033945? Its a western copyright, but PPG art is pretty common on here and the artist is Japanese.
Bionicman76 said:
And this one? post #7060076. I'm starting to think it's user bias.
Its not even deleted yet.
Post of yamaori some translated with a consistent art style
post #7027812
post #7027817
post #7027823
post #7027830
post #7027863
What's wrong with post #7042026? The artist's other work has gotten approved almost instantly but this one got deleted twice even though it looks almost the same as their other work?.
kinda curious why post #7055716 was not approved?
because of chibi? well there is huge category with this
because of "low" quality art? then why this was allowed post #7066904 post #7062220 post #7049586 ?
it don't present anything? dragon zodiac lady laying on hoard of gold with both MC as a part of her "collection" with her maid/assistant in the background having to clean stuff while her master sleeps on treasure
I'm not an artist but I always though that when it comes to chibi art it's more about cuteness/joke than "artstyle" and quality
zetsubousensei said:
Not mine though it did fail an appeal I made. What's the issue with post #3033945? Its a western copyright, but PPG art is pretty common on here and the artist is Japanese.
Its not even deleted yet.
Well it looked like more moderators than usual (13). And its been 2 and (insert fraction) days, and I usually get ignored anyway so, eh.
gzb said:
Not really, but the arms are bad.
Resourceful said:
The thin legs and waist are the main reasons for me.
Pandastel said:
Doodle too simple and rough for me;
Third-party edit with AI.
After appealing it, I'm kinda curious to know why post #6630538 was not approved in the first place?
There's a great use of perspective and otherwise other works from the author of similar quality have been approved so it's puzzling me.
I assumed it slipped through the cracks but maybe there's an underlying reason that I'm missing.
Is retro artstyle not considered good anymore? Wish we just disapproved by bad quality rather than just what is subjectively "liked". Upload limit went from 21 to 17. No explicit images btw.
post #7060076
post #7060091
post #7060096
post #7060113
post #7060124
post #7060126
post #7060132
post #7060139
post #7060144
post #7060151
post #7060164
post #7060167
Edit:what format is better horizontal list or vertical?
post #7060191
post #7060215 (why this one in particular?)
Updated