Hello, I would like a feedback of this post :
Posted under General
Hello, I would like a feedback of this post :
This one got 30 updoots, why no keep? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6989772?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
Same goes with these two: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6885682?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6839949?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
Hello, I wonder what was wrong with this post? (it's a highres version of an previously uploaded image) :
post #6987495
ILikeBuffGirls123 said:
This one got 30 updoots, why no keep?
See
blindVigil said:
They're completely meaningless. They have no value whatsoever, approvers specifically ignore them when reviewing uploads. If no approver likes it enough to approve it then it makes no difference if 10 or 10,000 people have favorited/upvoted an image. Coomers upvote literally anything vaguely titillating and I trust 100 coomers a lot less as judges than 8 people who have earned Approver status.
Hello, could you tell me why this image was removed?
post #6999829
Please consider reviewing it again.
Updated
ILikeBuffGirls123 said:
This one got 30 updoots, why no keep? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6989772?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
Same goes with these two: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6885682?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6839949?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
I'm not an approver, but I think a lot of these would clear on appeal. I would highlight what you think the artistic merits are when you do.
Would like some feedback on post #6980302.
I think it's an interesting blend of No Straight Road design and the artist's art style.
Greetings!
I would like some feedback on these two posts :
post #6992756
post #6992705
Would the issue with the first one have to do with the proportions? Or was it the source?
The second one had some reviewers saying it broke the rules, but at first glance I can't tell what exactly would be.
Any feedback appreciated
Hello. Sorry if I come off sounding agressive in this but I don't know how else to word it.
Can we be less vague about what 3rd party edits are allowed? The wiki entry states 'Minor edits that don't substantially alter the content of the image may be allowed.' Which is rather subjective, as what I consider minor (post #6991554 & post #6991571) seem to have been deemed as major changes in the eyes of approvers but the wiki entry also states that stitched images are considered minor & may be allowed.
I don't think these fall under nude_filter as all the images that I checked with that tag have new material to them, whereas these 2 have art that the artist themself had already made.
Other than the source (didn't know I was supposed to just leave it with the file name), I don't know what other rules I've broken with these so hopefully some feedback can clear it up. Thanks in advance.
Deceased said:
Hello. Sorry if I come off sounding agressive in this but I don't know how else to word it.
Can we be less vague about what 3rd party edits are allowed? The wiki entry states 'Minor edits that don't substantially alter the content of the image may be allowed.' Which is rather subjective, as what I consider minor (post #6991554 & post #6991571) seem to have been deemed as major changes in the eyes of approvers but the wiki entry also states that stitched images are considered minor & may be allowed.
I don't think these fall under nude_filter as all the images that I checked with that tag have new material to them, whereas these 2 have art that the artist themself had already made.
Other than the source (didn't know I was supposed to just leave it with the file name), I don't know what other rules I've broken with these so hopefully some feedback can clear it up. Thanks in advance.
Approvers only see the "third party edit" warning in the queue, not what kind of edit it is. Stitched is fine, as long as it's necessary. I still wouldnt approve it, because of the missing source. We should be able to tell what images you stitched together.
FivePastNever said:
Greetings!
I would like some feedback on these two posts :
post #6992756
post #6992705Would the issue with the first one have to do with the proportions? Or was it the source?
The second one had some reviewers saying it broke the rules, but at first glance I can't tell what exactly would be.Any feedback appreciated
post #6992705 is probably AI-assisted to some degree or AI-generated. You can discuss it in topic #22285.
Is it because I am not a contributor that you ignore even the work of this excellent artist?
I was shocked by his pass rate and the quality of his work
previous works of this artist was okayed, was wondering why post #6993720 seems to have been disapproved
Why is this deleted? Other arts by this artist with the same style was approved?
Incredible. I guess I really do have terrible taste. I don't know why I'm bothering to leave them here, but I still maintain that these were all quality works, even if I'm the only one who thinks so.
post #6993031
post #6993068
post #6993096
post #6996079
post #6996194
post #6996240
Nacha said:
Approvers only see the "third party edit" warning in the queue, not what kind of edit it is. Stitched is fine, as long as it's necessary. I still wouldnt approve it, because of the missing source. We should be able to tell what images you stitched together.
What exactly is considered necessary & if not the file name, what should I have put as the source?
Also, I set them as a child post to post #6680310 & post #6946464 which also shows their siblings, so you should be able to tell what images were stitched together.
Pandastel said:
Feedback for these deleted arts, if nothing wrong, pls notice them
post #6966304
post #6966306
post #6966519
post #6966540
post #6968900
post #6969864
post #6970312
post #6968838
post #6973148
post #6982700
post #6985826
Why weren't post #6989678 and post #6989283 approved?
Deceased said:
What exactly is considered necessary & if not the file name, what should I have put as the source?
Also, I set them as a child post to post #6680310 & post #6946464 which also shows their siblings, so you should be able to tell what images were stitched together.
You need to add the source, where you got the two images from that you stitched together. (Twitter, pixiv, etc.)
Also: The tag stitched is only used, when you stitched together two images, that were separate before, for example something like this. It should not be used, when you edit two already complete images into one new version. So, if you connected two (or more) images, you should have a source to those images you put together.
Hello. I'd appreciate some feedback on this artwork if possible
post #6998131
It has been reviewed by 14 people, so it was far from overlooked. What could have been off putting here? Maybe something about the face, or hair?