Should kneepits be implied to standing split?

BUR #21254 has been rejected.

create implication standing_split -> kneepits

When a person does a standing split, they are showing their kneepits.

• this implication is doing the opposite, it'll add standing split to all kneepits posts fixed
• post #6902775

Not all standing splits expose kneepits; the character could be wearing pants, therefore covering the kneepits (case in point: post #6738243).

That be the same as implying all arm up and arms up posts as armpits, ignoring the fact that their clothes could be covering their armpits.

The bulk update request #21254 (forum #260195) has been rejected by @evazion.

A pose and a body part are two different things. The presence of a pose doesn't guarantee the presence of a body part.