post #6756539 how is poor quality? I think all it's look good.
Posted under General
post #6756539 how is poor quality? I think all it's look good.
post #6844172 What was the issue?
I got some help here so I figure I'll pass along what I know too.
hdll said:
I'm asking for the post #6840103 It's a Tamio's art of great quality. I united fragmented parts from different bgs sites, scattered images and later from the capcom Twitter page to complete the art. I later post it on twiter that day, why has it been deleted?
As far as I know, third-party edits are usually not within the upload rules, and a lot of them tend to go unapproved and get deleted.
Jingly said:
post #6844172 What was the issue?
Looks like more of a sketch like compared to the artist's other upped works. It's good in my personal opinion but still rough. If the artist publishes a more polished version I'd encourage you to try again, or try some of their other art
Jingly said:
post #6844172 What was the issue?
also her fingers are off
What about these?
hdk5 said:
What about these?
post #6650933
While certainly cute, it'd be the hands what's keeping me from approving it.
post #6563834
Even though it being a sketch isn't an issue by itself, the lines are a bit too rough for me.
post #6706337
Overall odd perspective, but mainly the hands.
May i know why these posts were deleted please ?
post #6846185
post #6846164
post #6846151
post #6846224
post #6846228
post #6846248
praaveeshraaj said:
May i know why these posts were deleted please ?
post #6846185
post #6846164
post #6846151
post #6846224
post #6846228
post #6846248
Rough / flat coloring.
Considering this a learning experience, could use some feedback for post #6850728
argentb said:
Considering this a learning experience, could use some feedback for post #6850728
There was nothing wrong with it, so went ahead and approved it.
Oftentimes posts will go unapproved if they can't find an approver that likes them enough in the three days after upload, even if there's nothing wrong quality-wise. In such cases, you can always appeal so that your post gets another three days and another chance at finding an approver.
Hi! I would like to have some feed back on
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6847446
The Ibuki one got rejected.
Why was post #6850178 approved but not post #6853057? They're pretty much identical.
Two pics post #6844839 post #6844719 of the same character by the same artist got approved but two others did not:
post #6844824
post #6844823 < two different version with the difference being tiny a tail.
post #6844764
Some 40k
post #6846190
post #6846135
post #6801633
And a unicorn
post #6846165
Updated
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6853142?q=user%3AHugeAssFan What's with those posts getting deleted over small details? I mean yes they're not perfect, but they're still of high-quality enough to be on this website. I'm really starting to think you guys hate huge butts on touhoes.
HugeAssFan said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6853142?q=user%3AHugeAssFan What's with those posts getting deleted over small details? I mean yes they're not perfect, but they're still of high-quality enough to be on this website. I'm really starting to think you guys hate huge butts on touhoes.
While proportions can certainly play a role in a huge_ass post not getting approved, for that particular post above the main issue might actually be in the lines being a bit too rough/wonky in some areas, like, for example, in Jo'on's hand, or in the odd perspective used for Shion's high heel. You're right in that these are small details; however, combined with the haphazard line work where some lines weren't even trimmed when overshot, and the simpler shading, these small details really stand out.
Prooblem? post #6723507
any issue with these?
post #6854758
post #6854819
the artist has every other post approved and i don't see anything specifically off with these 2 images.
NuclearHellBird said:
While proportions can certainly play a role in a huge_ass post not getting approved, for that particular post above the main issue might actually be in the lines being a bit too rough/wonky in some areas, like, for example, in Jo'on's hand, or in the odd perspective used for Shion's high heel. You're right in that these are small details; however, combined with the haphazard line work where some lines weren't even trimmed when overshot, and the simpler shading, these small details really stand out.
Not that person but I do wonder what determines what is considered artstyle and what is bad anatomy. I mean when has a breast ever bent like the one against the guys dick? it looks like a fucking water balloon.
I know it's all fantasy but that is just one of those things where you know the person drawing it is the opposite sex of what they're drawing and has never seen that sex naked irl.
I can't see my other submission (tho I have no problem with my low effort works)
So what's the problem with this? post #2020269