Veraducks said:
Ah! Thank you! Wasn't sure which one of those connection tags to use!
Posted under Tags
Veraducks said:
Ah! Thank you! Wasn't sure which one of those connection tags to use!
As stated in the standalone poste that I foolishly started without looking down a little. Hi! I'm a long time lurker, posting up some of the stuff I find. Has been good fun, but I DEFINITELY have been going through a learning process
I was poking in to see if there was a tag for pockmarks and facial blemishes like that seen in post #6818375 ? I tried poking around for one and was a bit stumped when an obvious tag wasn't forthcoming.
after poking around, I found the rarely used pimple tag. That seems very specific. Would a face_blemish be a useful one to consider? Though I do have a feeling it would be regarded as a bit too general.
Thank~
argentb said:
As stated in the standalone poste that I foolishly started without looking down a little. Hi! I'm a long time lurker, posting up some of the stuff I find. Has been good fun, but I DEFINITELY have been going through a learning process
I was poking in to see if there was a tag for pockmarks and facial blemishes like that seen in post #6818375 ? I tried poking around for one and was a bit stumped when an obvious tag wasn't forthcoming.
after poking around, I found the rarely used pimple tag. That seems very specific. Would a face_blemish be a useful one to consider? Though I do have a feeling it would be regarded as a bit too general.
Thank~
I don't have any strong opinions on this, but acne is currently aliased to pimple. If we want to make it more general, one option to consider is reversing it by aliasing pimple to acne.
In this case, however, I don't think such a tag would apply. The size and shading make them look more like puncture wounds to me (though I don't think we have a good tag for those either).
Looking for help with an author for post #6824451 . Source data sets the name to "1311474789," but that doesn't seem right.
argentb said:
Looking for help with an author for post #6824451 . Source data sets the name to "1311474789," but that doesn't seem right.
As a general note, this thread is for help with regular tags. Artist tags you need help with go in topic #8199 in the future.
But anyway, that's because "1311474789" is the Pixiv stacc name, and is indeed incorrect. The name you are looking for is "生锈的皮革", which is a Chinese name that must be romanized. Yellowbridge would romanize this as Shengxiu de Pige, but pinyin is not my area of expertise, so it may not hurt to ask for a second opinion.
I know multiple views is for two different images of a character in the same post and mutually exclusive with solo.
I also know magnified copies of an image are tagged zoom layer and can be tagged solo.
But in post #6824665, the (unrealistic) reflections are all flipped versions of the main image and are about the same size, so it doesn't seem like multiple views or zoom layer would fit. And if I understand correctly, solo also can't be used with reflection in these cases. Which combination of tags should be used?
Edit: Just found forum #98857. If it is correct, then solo can be used with reflection.
Updated
Blank_User said:
And if I understand correctly, solo also can't be used with reflection in these cases.
i see no contradiction with using reflection and solo
post #6825042
Is there a pre-existing tag for object between thighs or holding with thighs or some such?
luntoer said:
post #6825042
Is there a pre-existing tag for object between thighs or holding with thighs or some such?
The between legs tag includes objects being held between the legs.
We do have a between thighs tag as well.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6826396?q=user%3ACampy00
what is the name for that kind of drink bottle on the very bottom left
Campy00 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6826396?q=user%3ACampy00
what is the name for that kind of drink bottle on the very bottom left
Is there a tag for the doorbell camera view? post #6828648
Diet_Soda said:
Is there a tag for the doorbell camera view? post #6828648
What is the art program interface depicted here? Doesn't look like anything I've heard of before, much less used.
Maiden_in_Orange said:
What is the art program interface depicted here? Doesn't look like anything I've heard of before, much less used.
Seems to be Concepts
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6833455?q=user%3ACampy00+status%3Apending
what tag for Pokemon trainer OCs that don't have an obvious in-game trainer class reference? (and don't have/need an artist/commissioner OC name tag otherwise)
(or is no specific tag needed?)
OblivionZero said:
Seems to be Concepts
Ah, thank you! I created a tag called Concepts (art program) in order to handle that.
Campy00 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6833455?q=user%3ACampy00+status%3Apending
what tag for Pokemon trainer OCs that don't have an obvious in-game trainer class reference? (and don't have/need an artist/commissioner OC name tag otherwise)
(or is no specific tag needed?)
OC trainers are typically tagged as Pokemon and Original. You don't need a character tag in these cases, I don't think, especially if you don't know their name.
I feel like post #6832722 is appropriate for the excessive_pubic_hair tag so I added it. But then I noticed someone else had removed it previously and has been removing it from a lot of posts recently as well. I feel that its correct here but maybe a second opinion is in order before I think this person just has a vendetta against the tag.
13Senrans said:
I feel like post #6832722 is appropriate for the excessive_pubic_hair tag so I added it. But then I noticed someone else had removed it previously and has been removing it from a lot of posts recently as well. I feel that its correct here but maybe a second opinion is in order before I think this person just has a vendetta against the tag.
It's a lot, but I don't think I would consider it "excessive", it's a definite edge case though.