Donmai

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

zetsubousensei

8253803 said:

Unfortunately, it seems to me that they have started using AI assistance for all their work since no later than this post (post #6064513), without tagging it on Pixiv.

Update: I noticed the left hand of post #6037637. Now I think it, too, is ai-assisted.

The other VTuber image looks human to me, I don't think it's AI, the Mona looks 100% AI to me, weighed in on it here last time it was posted.

Tagged 6561922 as assisted since there seem to be clear human-done parts with AI, not tagging the others.

Reply
zetsubousensei

Anyte said:

post #6569515

This looks like it might be. The leg looking more like a solid mass rather than two parts, and the way the hand not holding the cup has awkwardly curled fingers is pretty typical of AI generation.

You can see the original line art, it's very clearly human in my opinion. The things you mention look like human errors, and looking through their Pixiv shows typical artist growth.

Reply
8253803

wakasagi888 said:

post #6571993
post #6540418
post #6540421

First post has a very suspect resolution (multiples of 512) and some distinct blurring/artifacting on edges. The second and third have smooth, artifacted hair and a messed up keyboard, plus a similar aspect ratio and low resolution.

Also, they disabled comments on all their pixiv posts, which is almost always keep people from calling them out.

The ankles are completely missing from the first image. The second and third have broken left wrists and thumbs. These are definitely ai-generated.

Reply
Coprolite

So, I'm suspecting that some of Momisan's works might have AI involved. Mainly because there are several posts that feature characters taking strikingly similar posts.

For example; post #6524048, post #6532147, post #6540564, post #6542469, and post #6590154 has characters striking the same poses with only minor differences on how their foot was drawn.

In addition, in some of his earlier post almost a year ago there are several posts of what seems to look like character's head being juxtaposted over some AI-esque body or something, before being rapidly "ironed out" a few months later.

Tbh, I feel like I might be overthinking a bit, as there are some posts that looks like the artist are redrawing a cropped image an actual body parts (especially apparent in close-up image), but the drastic quality improvement in just 2 months is just a wee bit too fast. Though I still held benefit of the doubt here and would like to hear your comments about this.

Updated

Reply
Mayhem-Chan

TrueKringe said:

So, I'm suspecting that some of Momisan's works might have AI involved. Mainly because there are several posts that feature characters taking strikingly similar posts.

For example; post #6524048, post #6532147, post #6540564, post #6542469, and post #6590154 has characters striking the same poses with only minor differences on how their foot was drawn.

In addition, in some of his earlier post almost a year ago there are several posts of what seems to look like character's head being juxtaposted over some AI-esque body or something, before being rapidly "ironed out" a few months later.

Tbh, I feel like I might be overthinking a bit, as there are some posts that looks like the artist are redrawing a cropped image an actual body parts (especially apparent in close-up image), but the drastic quality improvement in just 2 months is just a wee bit too fast. Though I still held benefit of the doubt here and would like to hear your comments about this.

For the repeating poses and also the heads on the older works, this doesnt really mean AI:
- I've seen a fair number of fetish artists also having the trouble of being especially good at drawing some part of the body but bad at drawing faces, or some other part of the body.
- The poses are likely a matter of the artist being lazy/cleverly lazy with their art, they are likely using an already drawn artwordk of theirs to save time and effort and then slapping different faces on it each time. Ai is less likely to consistently remake the same pose and rendering again and again if it's such a high degree of similarity, Ai tends to have some other inconsistencies when you tell it to do the same pose/composition

However the sudden spike in quality is indeed suspicious, even though i'm unable to point to anything concrete to give weight to the suspicion and the spike is nowhere near as dramatic as other cases i've seen of artists picking AI

Reply
user 1051171

Super_Affection said:

post #6601532: Checking because pixiv #110947486 is tagged as AI-generated. I'm wondering if it could be some kind of mistake, because this looks pretty consistent with the artist's previous work to me... I guess the eyes look a little different but I don't know if I'm overthinking it.

there is no such tags on the source page too so the autotagger went dumb perhaps?

Reply
1 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 118