Drimacus said:
post #6401492 Does not look like loli. Just petite imo.
Do you agree?
Doesn't look nsfw enough to warrant the loli tag to me
AkaringoP said:
Please check this along with that.
post #6400875
that's absolutely loli
Posted under General
Drimacus said:
post #6401492 Does not look like loli. Just petite imo.
Do you agree?
Doesn't look nsfw enough to warrant the loli tag to me
AkaringoP said:
Please check this along with that.
post #6400875
that's absolutely loli
Same image, one is tagged loli and the other isn't. Which is correct?
I assume so but I wanna make sure.
Unbreakable said:
I assume so but I wanna make sure.
looks loli to me
Vasi1 said:
post #6260458
post #6260459
not loli
I can only saw one image in the source, but that is definitely not a loli.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
why would that be loli?
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Kiki is a young girl, and even if it isn't sexually explicit, the image looks very foot fetishy.
Based on that artists Pixiv it is unambiguously fetishistic. Though it's a canon scene from the movie, so I'm not sure if the picture in a vacuum counts as loli.
post #6409212
Seems a bit too tame for loli in my opinion. Anyone else agree?
Edit: Removed loli tag after feedback.
Updated
Blank_User said:
post #6409212
Seems a bit too tame for loli in my opinion. Anyone else agree?
Doesn't even look like the body of a child to me
Got a few more borderline ones here:
post #5973326
post #6164409 / post #6169002
post #6191828
post #6434122 / post #6454857
post #6494689 looks petite to me.
Blank_User said:
Got a few more borderline ones here:
post #5973326
post #6164409 / post #6169002
post #6191828
post #6434122 / post #6454857
I would say loli on the first four and not on the last two.