post #6157945 seem to be loli.
Posted under General
post #6157945 seem to be loli.
Should this be marked loli because of the pantyshot?
post #5400407
Maybe also this one, it's tagged child, but rated sensitive
post #4549104
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Should this be marked loli because of the pantyshot?
post #5400407
Maybe also this one, it's tagged child, but rated sensitive
post #4549104
I vaguely remember a higher rank user somewhere saying that child tags should be reserved for completely sfw posts
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Should this be marked loli because of the pantyshot?
post #5400407
Maybe also this one, it's tagged child, but rated sensitive
post #4549104
I'm having a tough time deciding the first one. I don't consider the second one to be loli, though.
post #6151233 - uploader insists on this being loli + G
kittey said:
post #6151233 - uploader insists on this being loli + G
That is absolutely Sensitive. Could go either way on tagging it loli, though.
Also, that user has been misrating dozens of posts as General, they should probably get a bonking.
Anyone able to check the loli tagging of user Ayukondoru? Some of the tagged posts feels legit but some like post #6164982 and children doesn't feel loli to me.
I wonder if this one post #6170606 should be tagged as loli?
Not sure if older Rika or not.
Maybe this one post #6181468
The boy might be young enough looking to be tagged as shota. Also, look at his lap.
I have tagged this as loli, but I would like a second opinion.
Jigsy said:
Not sure if older Rika or not.
I would say no to loli, small breasts but developed face, hands, and legs.
denliner27 said:
Maybe this one post #6181468
just a pudgy loli.
post #5128793
post #5234723 (both are pretty much the same image)
Leaning toward loli on these. Kissed deeply by adult man with saliva trial and tongue shown afterwards.
This looks like it should be loli to me
post #3547357