Posted under General
Why are these 4 posts not approved?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6352476 - It's child post with simple white background is already approved.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6348790 - These 3 posts have high upvote scores.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6324337
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6324325
godwjdqks12 said:
Why are these 4 posts not approved?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6352476 - It's child post with simple white background is already approved.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6348790 - These 3 posts have high upvote scores.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6324337
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6324325
Wolf_of_Gubbio said:
can i have reasons for
post #6140073
post #6271827
post #6119601thanks
Personally, not a fan of any. The posts are a bit wonky and score is meaningless for approval, especially for NSFW artworks.
Off-topic, but you both could put more effort into tagging your uploads, sometimes it feels like you click related tags and call it a day.
post #6355113 why not approved?
What exactly is "poor quality" about post #6362956? Is there some anatomical error or something I'm missing?
Can someone explain why post #6362092 wasn't approved?
Could I please get some feedback on these unapproved posts? They're similar in content to related posts from the artists have been approved, and they're all good quality with anatomical accuracy.
Could I please get the approval of following posts before they get deleted? They have already acquired quite enough favorites and score.
I know danbooru is not a porn site but users do appreciate this kind of images and their quality is quite good.
Thank you for understanding.
sohibil said:
Could I please get the approval of following posts before they get deleted? They have already acquired quite enough favorites and score.
Images aren't approved because of a high score or many favs. Even images with a very high score can still be really bad. Also, a score of 5-7 and favs is very very low.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6361013
Would like some feedback as to why it was removed.
post #6355113
post #6368177
post #6368173 (parent post #6368171)
post #6368163 (parent post #6365003)
post #6368160 (parent post #6365004)
How bad?
All lovely images, please pass
post #6340564
post #6350039
post #6367502
post #6368316
post #5787225
post #6330131
and，post #6368298
imitates Crayon Shin-Chan's painting style like post #6361525 , and I think its quality is not bad
NPEE2003 said:
post #6355113
post #6368177
post #6368173 (parent post #6368171)
post #6368163 (parent post #6365003)
post #6368160 (parent post #6365004)
How bad?
post #6368160
post #6368163
post #6368173
"1 believe it has poor quality." How poor quality? Please give the reason.
NPEE2003 said:
post #6355113
post #6368177
post #6368173 (parent post #6368171)
post #6368163 (parent post #6365003)
post #6368160 (parent post #6365004)
How bad?
Still waiting for this
NPEE2003 said:
Still waiting for this
Stop double posting and asking multiple times for the same images. And stop demanding any feedback.
This is also no the first time you did this forum #238663 forum #238113
Rules for those requesting feedback:
#1 - You are not guaranteed feedback. It is entirely voluntary to give it.
I can tell you that demanding feedback or asking for the same image multiple times will only make approvers not want to give you feedback.
Nacha said:
Stop double posting and asking multiple times for the same images. And stop demanding any feedback.
This is also no the first time you did this forum #238663 forum #238113I can tell you that demanding feedback or asking for the same image multiple times will only make approvers not want to give you feedback.
Oh I'm sorry.
Please explain why this post was removed post #6324387
Obviously the quality is good, did you not check it at all?
post #6377112
post #6377101
post #6376376
post #6376236
post #6369308
post #6350039
I'm not sure if it's because I linked the Pixiv source where the artist posted a watermarked version of the image, and that I posted an unwatermarked version I got from the artist that this image is still not approved. Not to mention that they were of the same, if not better, quality than the previously approved work of this artist.
