AkaringoP said:
As for Oral_invitation, there are posts that use that tag that are simply sticking out their tongue, so I need to clean up that to make sure it's really an oral_invitation.
Also, tell me about the example I mentioned.
When going through the oral invitation posts, there were several I did not re-rate because I only focused on what seemed the most clear-cut. However, there is a specific pattern with many of the legitimate oral invitation posts. It's a little hard to explain, but the character will often have a rounded mouth, pointy tongue, visible breath, several visible saliva strings inside the mouth, or some combination of these. They may also be in a kneeling pose, have their hands in front with their palms up, or displaying a lewd gesture. Based on the criteria I listed for faces, the girl in your example definitely looks less "Nyeh!" and more "Insert cock here" to me regardless of context.
I think it's safer to keep the tags on false positives than risk removing one for a legitimate case given the sexual nature of the tag. It might be best to wait for someone with more experience with these kind of posts to go through them.
AkaringoP said:
I've said it before (to others), but It seems that any major modification to any tag should go through a BUR and be reviewed. It's a pain in the ass for the person doing it, and there are too many examples that don't make sense.
What kind of BUR are you talking about? We're talking about misrating, not mistagging. I didn't rerate them simply because they were tagged with oral invitation. I even removed a couple of the tags myself, including one that was apparently used to tag a literal invitation given orally. Changing the tags won't change how those posts should be rated.
feline lump said:
The other oral invitation posts are also clearly sexually suggestive and therefore Q. I'll let someone else check the licking posts as they're closer to the S/Q borderline.
Is there any other discussion about this borderline I can refer to in the future?
I think posts where either character is visibly aroused or leaves saliva trails would fall under Q. I think if the recipient was laughing or smiling without clear signs of arousal, it would fit the spirit of S, but I don't want to be too lax with the guidelines. Licking feet viewed from the licker's POV like in post #4636687 seems like it should be Q.
Some images in post #6124121 are Q, but I know some posts like this are sometimes rated lower because they only make up a very small part of the main image.