Hereinafter said:
post is already flagged but this does look ai to me, just look at the hair ribbons
Posted under General
Hereinafter said:
post is already flagged but this does look ai to me, just look at the hair ribbons
post #5404632
An other flag without a tag.
ion288 said:
post #5404632
An other flag without a tag.
Unless they've started making AI models on beginner artists this clearly isn't Ai-gen, + has nothing in common with the actual ai-gen stuff under this same artist
Do you block artist who plagiarize using AI?
https://twitter.com/8W5ha8/status/1642413231800217600
Hyoroemon said:
Do you block artist who plagiarize using AI?
https://twitter.com/8W5ha8/status/1642413231800217600
No, but their "works" aren't welcome here, reason why this thread exists. Original artists and artworks are credited when possible, like post #6126591 and post #6128949.
Hyoroemon said:
Do you block artist who plagiarize using AI?
https://twitter.com/8W5ha8/status/1642413231800217600
This is someone saying AI artists shouldn't be allowed to complain if their works get stolen. Not sure what the relevance is to this thread.
feline_lump said:
This is someone saying AI artists shouldn't be allowed to complain if their works get stolen. Not sure what the relevance is to this thread.
i don't think people are care enough to warrant making new thread over it. This thread is where everyone who follow/discuss danbooru stance on AI gather so might as well ask here.
Hyoroemon said:
i don't think people are care enough to warrant making new thread over it. This thread is where everyone who follow/discuss danbooru stance on AI gather so might as well ask here.
Nothing about this subject affects Danbooru in any way. This is not a general AI discussion thread.
This and other posts from the source have inconsistent artstyle, generic pose, among other things.
Also from Twitter:
Ai Assisted / Using my own custom filters and editing sets for post work.
VR-Man said:
post #6230160
This and other posts from the source have inconsistent artstyle, generic pose, among other things.Also from Twitter:
Ai Assisted / Using my own custom filters and editing sets for post work.
post #6230160 looks like a bad case of AI + posterize filter + add border + noise filter + upscale to 400 %. Not sure what “editing sets” are supposed to be besides “I select these filters and click apply”. Maybe the creator turned the post-processing into a one-click macro in Photoshop and that’s the “editing set”? At any rate, I was able to produce a similarly looking result from a randomly picked AI image with those filters within 10 minutes. If I had saved it as a macro, it would take me 10 seconds to apply it to any other image.
VR-Man said:
This and other posts from the source have inconsistent artstyle, generic pose, among other things.
Also from Twitter:
Ai Assisted / Using my own custom filters and editing sets for post work.
His Pixiv gallery has 466 images with his first upload being December 2nd 2022.
That's roughly 3.8 images per day without resting. Robot account.
Edit: And even if someone edits their work, just ask yourself, do you still want Danbooru to be flooded with this type of content? What happens when that number jumps to 1,000 images created in a short amount of time? Then 5,000 or 10,000?
No Human has time to go through everyone of these galleries and approve them all.
Updated
Their pre-November pixiv gallery shows amateur, massively inconsistent artwork that suddenly settles into a cookie-cutter NAI style in the span of 1 week, complete with all the usual jank, eg the bra breaking up into two parts on post #6207487.
Unsure if a case could be made for AI-assisted.
Diet_Soda said:
Their pre-November pixiv gallery shows amateur, massively inconsistent artwork that suddenly settles into a cookie-cutter NAI style in the span of 1 week, complete with all the usual jank, eg the bra breaking up into two parts on post #6207487.
Unsure if a case could be made for AI-assisted.
I'd like to mention they have sketches and making-ofs on Twitter, but I'm aware of AI artists faking it all.
Seems like another case of an artist that draws sketches and relies on AI for shading. post #6207484 is most obviously AI on the hair and eyebrows, while the overall composition was obviously done by a human. post #6207746 also appears to be a case of human shading being mixed with AI shading.
On the other hand, some of their early AI work like post #5931735 or post #5946526 is so egregiously AI that there's not much point in distinguishing it from purely generated work.
post #6233132 is probably AI-generated. the left hand, under the head, seems non-existent
Wolf_of_Gubbio said:
post #6233132 is probably AI-generated. the left hand, under the head, seems non-existent
AI filter over post #6112079. Her hand is behind her head.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
What about it makes you suspicious? Nothing caught my attention after a quick check.