Posted under General
post #6147550
It was rated G by poster. I tried to change it to sensitive (naked_overalls(or naked_apron) tag and artist suggestive commentary), but OP undid it. Then @VR-Man and @blindVigil came and set rating:s, but OP kept reverting it back to G(and also deleting commentary tag multiple times for some reason¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
@Vampire10 Has been regularly misrating things, going so far as to revert others' changes to it (including removing commentary on that post). At this point it's bordering on vandalism. I advise they knock it off, and soon.
Are the presence of used condoms enough for it to be rated explicit?
VR-Man said:
Are the presence of used condoms enough for it to be rated explicit?
Yes.
S or Q?
The_Bob said:
I don't think any nudity is allowed under "Sensitive".
Unbreakable said:
It is, but it's usually reserved for chibi or very "covered" nudity, this one is a clear Q though.
Thanks. I bumped post #6164574 to Q as well.
The_Bob said:
Thanks. I bumped post #6164574 to Q as well.
That one is even more clearly Q (bordering on E, even) because of the barely steam-covered crotch.
Currently rating:q, but lactation would fall under rating:e. However, I have no idea if this is milk or drool. And does drool+breastfeeding -> rating:e ?
post #6224313 Q or S ?
fav said:
post #6224313 Q or S ?
howto:rate has this under Q:
Nipples […] clearly visible though clothing, including covered nipples […]
I rerated some posts from S to Q, but @AkaRingoP seems adamant in changing them back. I first noticed it when I realized we went back and forth on post #5446714. I sent a DMail pointing out specific details in the image and referenced howto:rate for Q ratings:
Blatantly sexually suggestive situations (fellatio gestures, oral invitations, etc).
In response, @AkaRingoP reverted several re-ratings of oral invitation and licking ear posts, including the aforementioned post as well as post #5632175 and post #1086790, and tried to justify it by saying sticking out one's tongue and ear licking are not necessarily sexual. Which is true, but these posts are clearly sexually charged. In a second DMail, I pointed out the fellatio gesture in post #5632175 and also cited howto:rate for the ear-licking posts:
Mild sexual contact (ear biting, groping, grabbing another's breast, heavy kissing, etc)
Then they started reverting posts with the licking neck despite me citing the above guideline, and even reverted the post with the fellatio gesture again. I'm absolutely certain I am interpreting the guidelines correctly. Is there anyone who doesn't agree and think they should be in S instead?
You're right, this is a clear example of willful misrating. If you're actively tagging posts as fellatio gesture and oral invitation, you can't pretend they're not at least Q.
I've never actively claimed that tag.
While post #5446714 is somewhat sensitive, I think putting it in Q is a bit of a stretch.
There are a lot of similar posts.
Lots of other tags.
But you think they all fall under Q?
I don't think you start with Q because you have those tags, I think you find them in the middle of a Q or E situation.
post #3370983
post #3216743
post #6124121
post #1086790
post #558667
post #3278046
post #4691578
post #2866707
Etc..
You really think this is all Q? Seriously?
You tagged post #5632175 as fellatio gesture while repeatedly rating it as S. Either it's not a fellatio gesture (which it obviously is), or it's not S.
The other oral invitation posts are also clearly sexually suggestive and therefore Q. I'll let someone else check the licking posts as they're closer to the S/Q borderline.
feline_lump said:
You tagged post #5632175 as fellatio gesture while repeatedly rating it as S. Either it's not a fellatio gesture (which it obviously is), or it's not S.
The other oral invitation posts are also clearly sexually suggestive and therefore Q. I'll let someone else check the licking posts as they're closer to the S/Q borderline.
For that post, the gesture is so obvious that I don't know what else to say.
As for Oral_invitation, there are posts that use that tag that are simply sticking out their tongue, so I need to clean up that to make sure it's really an oral_invitation.
Also, tell me about the example I mentioned.
I've said it before (to others), but It seems that any major modification to any tag should go through a BUR and be reviewed. It's a pain in the ass for the person doing it, and there are too many examples that don't make sense.
AkaringoP said:
Q???
I'd say yes because of the clear case of covered nipples
Mayhem-Chan said:
I'd say yes because of the clear case of covered nipples
Okay, but it would have been easier to understand if he had added the tag at the time he changed the rating.
