Posted under General
post #6027108 is slightly borderline for its impossible sweater, but otherwise, I agree that a character simply having large breasts without anything sexual going on shouldn't be S. Taut clothing is just a fact of life for some people. There are far more suggestive misrated posts in G to focus on.
Do you think posts that imply death by suicide or when ambiguous red liquid is present in high number like this should be rated S? post #6030689
So we have legal drugs as G and illegal drugs as S. Is marijuana G or S? Its legality is extremely variable, and most of the people drawing it are in regions where it is legalized.
World_Funeral said:
Do you think posts that imply death by suicide or when ambiguous red liquid is present in high number like this should be rated S? post #6030689
sexually suggestive posts are S by default, so I think posts with strong implications of graphic violence should be treated the same.
Updated
Tagged S, but since she's reaching crotchward, I feel like it might be in Q territory.
The_Bob said:
Tagged S, but since she's reaching crotchward, I feel like it might be in Q territory.
I would say S. She is touching her thigh, not her crotch.
post #6080437
and children
Should any depiction of blood on object or on body part even without visible injury be instantly rated S? As on post #6081341 for instance.
G or S?
VR-Man said:
post #6087143
G or S?
Sorry, I'd rather rate it S because the image seem to focus on her large breasts. As what howto:rate stated, S is for anything we are not sure if it's completely SFW or not.
World_Funeral said:
Should any depiction of blood on object or on body part even without visible injury be instantly rated S? As on post #6081341 for instance.
I would say S on that image. G might be OK if the blood is more ambiguous or insignificant
Ardouru said:
I'm sorry but that image being anything but G is laughable.
How is this "trivial or cartoon violence" as per howto:rate? It's clearly not what's supposed to be G.
Nameless_Contributor said:
How is this "trivial or cartoon violence" as per howto:rate? It's clearly not what's supposed to be G.
Blood on a weapon that's not being used, with no actual violence depicted, seems pretty trivial imo
Like Vigil said, there is no actual violence happening. And to play devil's advocate, who says it's even blood in the first place? Obviously it's meant to be but it might as well just be paint. That's how trivial it is. Or are we really trying to make general even less useful of a rating than it already is?
Nameless_Contributor said:
Blood on a weapon that is clearly implied to have been used to MURDER someone.
Not in the image. We rate individual pages of hentai comics general, so I don't see why we rate this image sensitive when the violence doesn't even exist in a related image.
I have few questions.
I rated it as Q. Need a second check if it is the case, as it's implied that she is undressing, revealing her "breasts", but she's an android so it becomes "mechabare" instead.
Unsure if implied_sex and should possibly be rating:e.
