Donmai

futasub implications

Posted under Tags

I feel like many of the -sub and -dom tags are a bit pet-ish. I know someone went through and tagged lolidom on a couple of pictures but far from comprehensively and only the one time. And other haven't really used it at all, either. I feel like that's the case for similar tags.

As for the BUR, the first part is a no-go for me. Images like post #5097562 are definitely not futasub despite being male on futa. I think the issue is that the x on x tags aren't being used to denote who is on top as the wiki implies, but rather x penetrating y.

Veradux said:
As for the BUR, the first part is a no-go for me. Images like post #5097562 are definitely not futasub despite being male on futa.

I think futasub being only for futanari being dominated is too restrictive. It should be for futanari being on the receiving end in general, which would qualify that picture too. But I'll wait for more opinions. futasub is probably a bad term for it in the first place, but having such a narrow definition ensures it'll just be a pet tag.

At first I found this BUR terrible. I'm no longer against it. It is difficult to find any assertive futanari tagged with male_on_futa. I found post #351998, post #4212981, post #2082681 and post #4197490

I consider futasub an ambiguous tag name. futanari_submission versus submissive_futanari. I don't consider post #492005 and post #2353915 to contain submission through restraints. Apart from name issues, the definition must remain consistent with possible future tags male_sub and female_sub. Furthermore I might consider having it as a pool instead.

Tags male_on_futa and futa_on_male might need new names. There is potential for mistagging post #92324, post #1051980 and post #2314110.

P.S.
I consider there to be a scale axis: Dominant Male - Assertive Male - Consensual - Assertive Futanari - Dominant Futanari

1