imply gloved_handjob -> handjob, gloves

BUR #5789 has been rejected.

create implication gloved_handjob -> handjob
create implication gloved_handjob -> gloves

Subset. Still don't see much point in this tag but might as well have it tagged correctly.

Agreed on both. That it feels kinda superfluous, but should be implicated properly anyway.

I trust there is no 'mistaggings' that will cause potential problems with the implicated tags being dragged in. So, voting yes.

Having handjob + gloves in one picture doesn't guarantee that it isn't simply a picture of someone giving a handjob to a character who wears gloves, I guess, is where the usefulness of the tag comes in.

The handjob + gloves posts within the past year contain roughly 30 posts that aren't gloved handjobs, vs. 436 others; give or take about 20 where the amount of glove-to-penis contact is dubious. That's about 89% to 93% overlap. I'll leave it to others to decide what level of overlap is considered superfluous.

BUR #5791 has been rejected.

nuke gloved_handjob

feline_lump said:

The handjob + gloves posts within the past year contain roughly 30 posts that aren't gloved handjobs, vs. 436 others; give or take about 20 where the amount of glove-to-penis contact is dubious. That's about 89% to 93% overlap. I'll leave it to others to decide what level of overlap is considered superfluous.

Yeah, that's what I meant. The tag is nearly equivalent with a gloves handjob search. For reference, topic #17946.
93% is pretty close to the 95% limit to requesting implications.

Given that you get more relevant results right now by searching for gloves handjob than gloved_handjob, I guess I'll also submit this and let the community decide.

I'm in support of nuking the tag given it's overall redundancy to the two-tag search.

I think it doesn't hurt to keep regardless of overall redundancy due to the false positives (even if they are fairly few in comparison to the huge overlap) but I don't really feel strongly one way or the other.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #5789 (forum #188017) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #5791 (forum #188024) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.