Pointless Pools

ion288 said:

pool #12660. Merged with pool #12638

Since this is pretty much the same issue as what I have asked earlier (ref: forum #187413, forum #187415), I have proceeded to depopulate pool #12660 and delete it.

Edit: For future reference, builders have pool deletion privileges, so I think you can do so for similarly redundant pools if you run into them again. Ones that you think are unambiguously redundant and don't need discussion over.

And, nope, I did not know about it (builders being able to delete pools) either until nonamethanks told me how to delete pools.

pool #12179

Has gotten 2 posts in 4 years.

pool #7297

I don't know if this is considered "pointless", but is this pool actually useful as a reference as the title says? Looks like a favorite pool to me.

pool #15850 - "Torpedo tits"

Should be adequately covered by sagging_breasts?

kia'ra said:

pool #15850 - "Torpedo tits"

Should be adequately covered by sagging_breasts?

No, it's for very pointy breasts. post #4575781 are not sagging

kia'ra said:

nonamethanks said:

@SSJG, @Guaro and @blindVigil have actually all already agreed in this thread that Torpedo Tits is objective enough to be a tag itself, but it was never acted on.

What do you suggest as a name? "torpedo tits" is not good enough. very perky breasts, like our other very_* tags? pointy breasts?

nonamethanks said:

What do you suggest as a name? "torpedo tits" is not good enough. very perky breasts, like our other very_* tags? pointy breasts?

Is there a difference between Torpedo Tits and pointy_breasts? If I google "torpedo tits" the results are a bunch of porn site "pointy tits" searches.

Oh, I didn't even realize we had posts in pointy breasts. Yeah at first glance those look like what you'd see in the torpedo tits pool, so I guess the problem has solved itself.

BUR #5942 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Torpedo_Tits -> pointy_breasts -pool:Torpedo_Tits
create alias very_perky_breasts -> pointy_breasts
create alias torpedo_breasts -> pointy_breasts

Also slapped in some utility aliases because I already know I'll be the first to forget the right name for the tag

So, we have both a tag and a pool for Starter Pokemon trio: starter_pokemon_trio and pool #4223.

Which of them should be kept?

BUR #5944 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio -> starter_pokemon_trio -pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio

Given that it's an objective concept, and there's not a single post under pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio -starter_pokemon_trio where I wouldn't use the tag, the pool is not needed imo.

pool #17274 and pool #17275.
no further explanation.

mongirlfan said:

So, we have both a tag and a pool for Starter Pokemon trio: starter_pokemon_trio and pool #4223.

Which of them should be kept?

nonamethanks said:

BUR #5944 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio -> starter_pokemon_trio -pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio

Given that it's an objective concept, and there's not a single post under pool:Pokemon_-_Starter_Trio -starter_pokemon_trio where I wouldn't use the tag, the pool is not needed imo.

+1
Far more objective than Touhou "stage gatherings" and Kancolle/AzLane "ship class gatherings", so yes, I'd agree it can be turned into a tag with the pool made redundant.

(It's always exactly three pokemon that everybody knows. A closed class, unlike "stage gatherings" and "ship class gatherings", which can be partial groups and are "open classes" which change every time a new relevant character gets introduced.)

The bulk update request #5944 (forum #189214) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #5942 (forum #189211) has been approved by @evazion.

Since I remembered this thread again, I'd like bring up pool #1513 once more. It's made redundant given that one can search height_difference + hetero, yaoi or yuri. The only argument I can see against it is that it's supposedly only for "romantic" images so it doesn't accept one of the partners being more dominant.

BUR #5998 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Height_Doesn't_Matter -> height_difference -pool:Height_Doesn't_Matter

As above.

BUR #5999 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Animification -> animification -pool:Animification

Drawing a non-anime character in an anime style is a pretty straightforward concept.

evazion said:

BUR #5999 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update pool:Animification -> animification -pool:Animification

Drawing a non-anime character in an anime style is a pretty straightforward concept.

Wonder if this tag doesn't risk ballooning out. I'm not saying we don't need it, but nearly everything under real life that is not asian people, or anything under western copyrights like spider-man (series) or batman (series) could fit under it.