Kyusey said:
It's pretty poor quality all around. Seems like the sort of low effort guro/amputee stuff that floods pixiv.
Posted under General
Kyusey said:
It's pretty poor quality all around. Seems like the sort of low effort guro/amputee stuff that floods pixiv.
yn said:
Lowres really hurts all of these. Kayneth's background is distractingly low-quality. Frankenstein's monster seems washed out on detail and pretty sketchy. I'd likely approve the Mordred if it were higher resolution.
I can see people not liking this
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4211092
but I do not know what rules that it violates and would like clarification.
Why is this particular upload of mine rejected?:
post #4198190
While this one was accepted?:
post #4198188
TheRealNepgear said:
I can see people not liking this
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4211092
but I do not know what rules that it violates and would like clarification.
Not anime-styled or of an anime-styled copyright, I guess.
Btw, please write post #4211092 and the site will add a link to that automatically.
Pxksnn said:
Why is this particular upload of mine rejected?:
post #4198190
While this one was accepted?:
post #4198188
The second one is drawn better. The first one is rather rough, especially the face. Just look at the eye lines, face outline and the color edge between the face and the hair.
kittey said:
Not anime-styled or of an anime-styled copyright, I guess.
I think a person like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyohara_Chikanobu
would probably see Danbooru as essentially Ukiyo-E and would probably think that we've come a long way. Personally I understand Patlabor, Gin Tama, Visual Novels and even Yakuza games better because of my contact with that kind of art so I would like to get it wired up with all of the tropes.
I would think Ukiyo-E genre prints in public domain that are really from Japan and thematically linked to modern anime, manga, and video game art are good for Danbooru but I do think quality, provenance, and all that matter.
post #4167588
What's wrong with it?
Kyusey said:
Hardcore fetish images are always harder to get approved, as it needs an approver who does really like it, OR the images really need to be of high quality. In this case the images are mediocre.
hahelos7s said:
Short arms, mediocre clothing, broken leg. Poorly drawn background, the image is overall not consistent.
No opinion on the bunny-ears one.
post #4227089
post #4141974
post #4213389
post #4211589
post #4175819
post #4170388
I don't see any problem about these posts.
Mysticus said:
I don't see any problem about these posts.
post #4227089 good body but bad face
post #4213389 poor lying position, makes the body look wrong
post #4211589 bad face, large eyes, flat face
post #4175819 large head compared to body
post #4170388 large head and wrong positioned facial features
overall are the last four rather rough
all of them have kinda bad faces IMO
Updated
these 2 by d8800880 are pretty solid all around; is it because they have large file sizes they weren't approved?
Could someone let me know why post #4185520 was deleted?
post #4220844
The sibling and the full art got deleted, but this not, what gone wrong with it?
I won't contest it because 6 approvers saying it has bad anatomy is pretty telling, but I'm wondering what parts of it are considered bad anatomy. The torso, maybe? It looks fine to me, but what do I know.