post #4094030 looks good to me?
Posted under General
post #4094030 looks good to me?
Its been awhile since I replied in this thread. Being negative tends to bring me down.
VR-Man said:
Not my upload, but I want to know why post #4092979 wasn't approved.
There are a number of anatomical errors in this one: those abs on green hair girl are not conforming to her body, her left leg does not connect to her hipp properly, some foreshortening on her right leg, her right hand looks wonky. White hair girl has twisted her right knee in a painful way.
Maxx98 said:
What wrong with these post's? I don't see any problem on them.
post #4090204
post #3387216
post #3387226
post #2780260
post #2829930
Questions about many posts at a time are less likely to be answered.
First one has several misplaced ears. Girl in the foreground has a super straight leg and a prosthetic left hand.
Second and third (why ask about two versions of the same image?): Some really thin necks which exasperate their oversized heads. The linework is a bit uneven.
Forth: The lack of linework on the background probably turned some approvers away. The shading quality is uneven. Its not a very interesting image. There doesnt have to be something "wrong" with an image for it to be deleted, failing to catch any of the approvers interest is often enough.
Fifth: Messy composition and many small flaws. Next!
Dudamel said:
post #4089892 looks like the same quality of its approved parent and sibling to me, can someone help me understand why it was deleted?
Im slightly surprised the other two posts got approved tbh. As Ive said before: Danbooru is an art repository that allows pornographic art but sexually explicit images are less likely to be approved than other images. Bukake isnt "in" at the moment and those are some badly drawn dicks.
leotard2020 said:
post #4084235 only think i can think of is the thigh gap but don't feel like that's enough for deletion.
post #4084200 a bunch of other pics from the same artist no idea why this wasn't approved
Guaro already answered but I want to point to the tiny hands and thin arms in the first image and the rather extreme thigh gap in the second one.
kah0922 said:
1055's works seem to get approved, and yet post #4086045 and post #4086037 weren't, despite being of the same art style and quality as all of other works. Why?
Edit: These two I don't get either
post #4087846
post #4087851
And I'm guessing these are because of the faces? Only one of zeromomo's works were deleted before this.
post #4089360
post #4089354
post #4089347
post #4089339
Again, dont ask about this many posts. You are unlikely to get an answer.
post #4086045 has a lot of copy pasting the same zomby. It doesnt really look like 1055s other work on the site.
post #4086037: My gods that left leg!
post #4087851: Shading is simplistic. Lines look a bit fuzzy, is this a scan? Points for concept but the art quality isnt there.
yn said:
This looks flat and unfinished. Quite small image size.
Elfaleon said:
Not dynamic enough?
Indeed. Also her neck must be really long to reach through that armored collar.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4101639
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4101622
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4101614
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4100473
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4101829
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4101803
Hello, I was told to post my questions of why my posts might not be approved here.
Some of the posts of the same artist I've posted have been approved, yet some have been not, can anyone offer some insight as to why they might not reach the danbooru standard?
Guaro1238 said:
post #4084085 guro and especially gury of that 'pet girl' isn´t liked that much. And it wasn´t needed to upload the same image twice. Then the quality is kinda poor in my eyes. More blurry and boring than really interesting, with the only really good part are her eyes.
"The source is on it's side but it looks more nature rotated counter clockwise. The room does have an blur effect but wouldn't call it distracting. The only issue I have with the body is where the legs attach to the waist could had been shaded better, does have some aliasing particularly with the hair, the anatomy good though. The room consists of just some pillows, wall, floor but not a white background but could see it being subjectively boring. don't see this being bad quality i'm convinced the non approval was do to the guro/pet girl theme but a builder can post things like post #3912032 post #3436532 post #2652146 without being flagged and deleted this not getting approved reeks of bias."
post #4088467 it´s fine, but special hardcore bondage isn´t that liked most of the time and most likely not approved
"if approvers don't like bondage than the site don't have a large enough sample size of approvers bondage isn't that niche of a theme"
leotard2020 said:
...
post #4084085 doesn´t have anything really interesting to give. The quality is mediocre , the blurry effect on her body makes it even look like it has a lower quality. I don´t even think that the other posts are comparable to your case, because you can clearly see the difference their, especially how the bodies are drawn. If you think that those are poor quality, you can still flag them and see if someone is going to approve it.
post #4088467 we do have 34k bondage images on the site and only 4-5k deleted. If the bondage is looking good, it´s approved. Otherwise it´ll be deleted.
In this case it´s mostly the hardcore bondage, with how the lower body is depicted that drives me off.
mlpoknbji said:
First and second: kinda creepy and mediocre quality. Especially the second one which is just to much IMO.
Third: Large foot/leg
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4103827
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4103813
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4103823
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4103804
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4103811
I didn't think that the art on these pictures were that bad.
mlpoknbji said:
post #4103827
post #4103813
post #4103823
post #4103804
post #4103811
It´s enough when you write "post #Post-ID" to link to a specific image.
post #4103827 Not sure about that one right now.
post #4103813 bad anatomy, short torso
post #4103823 long body IMO and I do think that not everyone likes stomach punch images
post #4103804 very weird face
post #4103811 same, kinda weird face
Updated
This time I’m more confused, the other posts I can understand but these two feel like good pieces of art...
UnderCurve said:
This time I’m more confused, the other posts I can understand but these two feel like good pieces of art...
Leonardo's bust and head are weirdly fused to her slightly too-short torso.
Gorgon has a slightly too long torso and some legs that are WAY thick (not a problem in and of itself) that attach to the rest of the body in a odd fashion. This one is at least stylized and I can definitely see it being approved.
post #4110234
Aside from there being nothing special, i dont really see any problem with this picture?
UnderCurve said:
post #4110234
Aside from there being nothing special, i dont really see any problem with this picture?
Nagisa’s pose and especially the leg proportions are really awkward.
Not my upload but I would like an explanation as its illustrator as to why post #4123519 went unapproved when the succeeding post #4128197 was acted upon.
If the reason is that the series isn't as popular as it was 8 years ago, then that's no reason to allow this to be deleted. The quality is just there, same as the succeeding post that was acted upon.
(Edited to correct error.)
Updated
ArcieA said:
Not my upload but I would like an explanation as its illustrator as to why post #4123579 went unapproved when the succeeding post #4128197 was acted upon.
If the reason is that the series isn't as popular as it was 8 years ago, then that's no reason to allow this to be deleted. The quality is just there, same as the succeeding post that was acted upon.
Did you perhaps link the wrong pieces? I can't see any thematic connection between the two already approved works you linked.
zero idea whats wrong with this, really starting to question the whole approval criteria.
HammyHydra said:
Bad hands and head/face perspective is off.
Eh, it’s not bad but kinda bland. Just another single character drawing with no background and nothing particularly interesting about it (pose, coloring, etc).