Not really sure what was wrong with it, artist got a unique style a few years ago
Updated
Posted under General
Not really sure what was wrong with it, artist got a unique style a few years ago
Updated
having a hard time getting bondage approved.
post #4100219 with 4600 favorites on pixiv and post #4100212 with 5900 favorites on pixiv. I appealed them, they both started with 15 reviews and at the end day 3 only went up to 16 reviews. same artist works that got approved post #3234822, post #2987311, post #4141864, other similar work that got approved post #3801089
same artist not approved post #4141934
more bondage not approved post #4108633. 89 approvals same artist mostly bondage.
softcore stuff but artist has 422 approvals here post #4094275
I would like to upload bondage but been avoiding it do to inconsistent approvals.
leotard2020 said:
having a hard time getting bondage approved.
post #4100219 with 4600 favorites on pixiv and post #4100212 with 5900 favorites on pixiv. I appealed them, they both started with 15 reviews and at the end day 3 only went up to 16 reviews. same artist works that got approved post #3234822, post #2987311, post #4141864, other similar work that got approved post #3801089
same artist not approved post #4141934
more bondage not approved post #4108633. 89 approvals same artist mostly bondage.
softcore stuff but artist has 422 approvals here post #4094275
I would like to upload bondage but been avoiding it do to inconsistent approvals.
Just to point out, I'm pretty sure pixiv favorites are irrelevant to whether a post is approved or not. It's based off the quality of the art, not how popular it is on other sites. Someone else will have to give feedback on the posts you mentioned, however.
So, what's the matter with post #4134738?
DownWithTheThickness said:
So, what's the matter with post #4134738?
Here. (Not the flagger)
DownWithTheThickness said:
Weird, it was approved and then deleted? It looks like they mistook the foreshortening for a very tiny thigh (which, admittedly, is hilarious).
I'll chime in and say I didn't really like the inside to outside curvature on what is theoretically a gem body and the way the butt seems sculpted slightly wrong. Arms are also pretty thin compared to the legs - though that was far from a dealbreaker.
post #4114633 the only thing I can think of here is the curvy palm tree, the background character,
and the background is a little bright. but they aren't the main focus of the image. can't figure out anything wrong with the girl changing into her swimsuit, maybe the knee a little narrow but the could just be the perspective of her razed leg.
Why keep post #4112636 but not post #4112638 post #4112640 post #4112650 post #4112654 post #4112661 post #4112666 post #4112672 post #4112677 post #4112681 in pool #16422 when the rest isn't even uploaded?
post #4148425 - I don't see any differences in quality between this post and several of the artist's other posts (such as post #4043858, post #3979337) which had no problem getting approved. The positioning of her breasts is a deliberate result of her buying an under-sized sports bra, which is the main focus of the image, and the only potential issue area I can think of. Feedback would be appreciated.
Updated
All of these post below are part of "Arknights - Encephal Zero story" & was wondering if someone can give these a chance?
what's wrong with these three?
Is there a difference between post #4151912 and post #4151776 besides the latter being uploaded by an unrestricted user?
VR-Man said:
Is there a difference between post #4151912 and post #4151776 besides the latter being uploaded by an unrestricted user?
Only difference is interlacing mode, pixel data is identical.
Anything wrong with post #4148878 when the censored version is fine?
post #4159202 and its siblings
Posted at the same time as the parent but weren't approved?
more trouble with getting bondage approved.
post #4160664, post #4160667, post #4160668. got this one approved post #4160530 other older approvals from same artist post #3234822, post #2987311. different artiest but this just got approved earlier today post #4164630
I assume that the post ( post #3513912 ) I uploaded well over a year ago had bad shading & the hat being a bit off so it doesn't meet the quality line the site has, but what's up with post #4165417 not getting approved?
*NSFW* post #4152739 the leg proportions are a bit weird but the art isn't that bad
May I ask what's wrong with this one? post #4158768