BUR #3196 has been approved by @evazion.
Show
create implication pill_earrings -> earrings
create implication pearl_earrings -> earrings
create implication tassel_earrings -> tassel
create implication tassel_earrings -> earrings
create implication anchor_earrings -> earrings
create implication snake_earrings -> earrings
create implication bell_earrings -> bell
create implication spade_earrings -> spade_(shape)
create implication feather_earrings -> feathers
create alias seashell_earrings -> shell_earrings
create implication shell_earrings -> shell
create implication triangle_earrings -> earrings
create implication butterfly_earrings -> earrings
create implication drop_earrings -> earrings
create implication pom_pom_earrings -> pom_pom_(clothes)
create implication bunny_earrings -> earrings
create implication bow_earrings -> bow
create implication bow_earrings -> earrings
create implication bat_earrings -> earrings
create implication dangle_earrings -> earrings
create alias rose_earrings -> flower_earrings
create implication mismatched_earrings -> earrings
create implication leaf_earrings -> earrings
create implication diamond_earrings -> earrings
create implication torii_earrings -> earrings
create implication lock_earrings -> lock
create implication lock_earrings -> earrings
create implication gold_earrings -> earrings
See topic #16523 for the pom pom implication's reasoning.
We also happen to have several colored tag earrings (pink earrings, blue earrings, aqua earrings etc). Thoughts about them? Should we nuke them?
For the specific case of yellow earrings I propose aliasing that to gold earrings, but the rest of the colored ones can be nuked imo. Only red and blue have posts in the hundreds (the latter probably due to bowsette), the rest have an irrelevant amount of posts.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3196 (forum #170703) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by evazion