Moved lightninglight to eguchi tumoru. For future reference, the thread for requesting artist name changes is topic #7713.
Posted under General
Moved lightninglight to eguchi tumoru. For future reference, the thread for requesting artist name changes is topic #7713.
What is background_base?
kittey said:
What is background_base?
I can't see any apparent similarity between any of the posts with this tag. It doesn't appear to serve any consistent purpose.
It seems that the tag was created by @NeverGonnaGive so maybe they'd be willing to explain its original intent.
kittey said:
What is background_base?
IIRC, it was a complement of avatar_base, wherein either was sourced or used in that facility of an artist’s account profiles. Again IIRC, I had run into some materials which did not have a proper works page of their own, and/or had interest to contextualizing the presence of said works for those unfamiliar with an artist’s full catalogue (especially for avatar_base, as those are often severely cropped). I suppose *_basis could be substituted, but these days I don’t know what merit this metadata would have anyway.
NeverGonnaGive said:
IIRC, it was a complement of avatar_base, wherein either was sourced or used in that facility of an artist’s account profiles. Again IIRC, I had run into some materials which did not have a proper works page of their own, and/or had interest to contextualizing the presence of said works for those unfamiliar with an artist’s full catalogue (especially for avatar_base, as those are often severely cropped). I suppose *_basis could be substituted, but these days I don’t know what merit this metadata would have anyway.
Those tags then should be meta and have a clarifying wiki, but I'm not sure if there's any use in having them given that typically such pictures are just crops of an artist's normally published work.
Can we clarify when, exactly, thunder should be tagged? Since sounds aren't generally visible it seems to me that this tag only makes sense when you can hear thunder in a sound-enabled video, or when sound effects (ゴロゴロ, ピカ, etc.) are seen. But a large proportion of the posts with this tag are just lightning.
bared teeth?
It seems like a combine of clenched teeth, grin, biting and roaring? Is it worth keeping?
yelite said:
bared teeth?
It seems like a combine of clenched teeth, grin, biting and roaring? Is it worth keeping?
If there's nothing unique about the tag, then no.
IMHO bared_teeth should only be for when the lips are curled to show the teeth like a snarling predator. It's not an expression of pain, like a grimace, or excitement, like a grin; it's an overtly hostile expression used as a threat. Good examples of the tag being correctly used are post #1847692, post #2139513, and post #3024109.
Shirt_slip needs a definition, if it is even necessary. Glancing through the posts with this tag, I see a lot of images that should have instead been tagged clothes_down, off_shoulder, or in the case of camisoles, strap_slip.
amigasa (編み笠) and torioigasa (鳥追笠)
They are both folded straw hat related to Awa Dance Festival.
they are called Amigasa (編み笠)，not to be confused with the very similar torioigasa (鳥追笠)，but worn differently, and the amigasa are sharper in the fold as well.
thoughts on big feet? imo it should be nuked, some of the posts like post #3979615 dont even have big feet
nonamethanks said:
thoughts on big feet? imo it should be nuked, some of the posts like post #3979615 dont even have big feet
I'll support nuking it.
It also looks like it's misdescribing foreshortening in almost all of it's posts anyway.
BUR #3065 has been approved by @evazion.
mass update revealing_swimsuit -> revealing_clothes swimsuit
Should this tag exist? It looks like a substitute for a two tag search.
"revealing swimsuit" is very broad as a concept and it could apply to pretty much anything under slingshot_swimsuit.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3065 (forum #169680) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by DanbooruBot
BrokenEagle98 said:
Aren't swimsuits by their very nature revealing? Unless it's the old-timey swimsuits where they wore full pants and shirts.
Should probably just nuke the tag.
They are to a degree, but the tagged images are almost all above and beyond anything you'd see anyone wear in the real world. I'd be for an implication or the mass update suggested to revealing clothes (the name practically defines it as a subset it anyway) or just tag gardening it. I don't know that it's useful enough to keep on its own especially with only 45 posts currently. It's a combo tag, and I wouldn't necessarily be against keeping it, but I don't know that it adds a lot.
I think it should be used for things like post #3981726? But as it is right now it's a bit unclear.
Shinjidude said:
They are to a degree, but the tagged images are almost all above and beyond anything you'd see anyone wear in the real world.
Isn't there already pool #10485 for that?