Posted under General
ion288 said:
Any one object if I nuke this tag?
no objection.
Provence said:
Is see-through_silhouette considered a subset of see-through?
It usually tag with clothing but there're translucent object ( curtains, folding_screen, blurry glass...) could fit too. I'm too lazy to find examples though.
Provence said:
Is see-through_silhouette considered a subset of see-through?
I don't think so, at least based on how the majority of users apply these two tags. With see-through, you can see visible details of whatever is underneath the clothing, like the bra in post #2658496 and the color of her skin. With see-through silhouette, you can see the outline of the person's body, as in post #2035423, but nothing else is discernible. If you can see more than just a backlit outline, it's not really a silhouette.
Would it be alright to rewrite the twilight wiki to be a little more specific? The current wording, "when the sun is low in the sky", overlaps with sunrise/sunset and is far broader than most definitions of the word. There are multiple definitions of twilight (see also here and here ), but the thing they all have in common is that the sun must be below the horizon.
A more restrictive definition of this tag was suggested before, back in forum #45471, but the wiki was never updated and as a result there are a ton of images tagged sun twilight or with other obvious signs that the sun is still above the horizon (e.g. hard shadows, lens flare, crepuscular rays). Most of these should be tagged sunrise or sunset instead.
What's forearms_on_chest supposed to be? Got added by @Bibs to post #3066310 (Loli) and I'm confused since the forearm (lower arms) are pointing away from the character and the tag has no wiki page.
Looks like w_arms to some extend.
The magic_hand and nobiiru_arm wikis appear to be conflicting - magic_hand's wiki states that high-performance extending hands should be tagged with nobiiru_arm, but nobiiru_arm's wiki states that it should be used for Kawashiro Nitori's spell card. Which is correct?
Based on the tag changes on post #3079347 it should probably be better stated when to and not to use company tags, right now it's only stated in Nintendo wiki and kinda in forum #119488, not even https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/87713 has it.
I've created the reverse deepthroat for, well, deepthroats from the other side of the head, specifically disembodied ones, after noticing we had no way to tag it. For some reason I doubt there's going to be an explosion of this kind of posts but I'm just gonna put it here for future reference in case someone is not sure what it means.
Is notice lines a variation of /\/\/\?
yelite said:
Is notice lines a variation of /\/\/\?
I guess? It's like a milder/calmer version of that.
yelite said:
Is notice lines a variation of /\/\/\?
I'd say their similar in function, but not in form as they are shaped pretty differently. Whereas /\/\/\ implies surprise or shock from a character, notice lines imply pretty much that... either the character has noticed something, or the artist wants the reader to notice something.
nonamethanks said:
The key difference, as I understand it, is that in a gangbang situation, one person has sex with multiple other people who do not sexually interact with each other. If any two individuals apart from the one who is the central focus are having sex, it's not a gangbang. See the Wikipedia article on the subject. As an example of this distinction, post #2903772 would not count as a gangbang, but post #2160946 would.
The rule against using the gangbang and threesome tags together dates from a time when the tags' usage was based on the number of males and females involved. Since the creation of the *_threesome tags, the gender makeup of gangbangs is no longer relevant, so I would consider this rule obsolete.
iridescent_slime said:
The key difference, as I understand it, is that in a gangbang situation, one person has sex with multiple other people who do not sexually interact with each other. If any two individuals apart from the one who is the central focus are having sex, it's not a gangbang. See the Wikipedia article on the subject. As an example of this distinction, post #2903772 would not count as a gangbang, but post #2160946 would.
The rule against using the gangbang and threesome tags together dates from a time when the tags' usage was based on the number of males and females involved. Since the creation of the *_threesome tags, the gender makeup of gangbangs is no longer relevant, so I would consider this rule obsolete.
I was going to populate the mmf/ffm/mmm/fff threesome tags but now I'm not so sure anymore since almost all of them fall under the definition of gangbang, since it's rare to see a pic (especially in the mmf case) where the two others are interacting with each other.
Are breast hold and breast rest mutually exclusive? I think yes, first beause of the tagcount (15k vs 3k) and breast rest looks more like another person or object is supporting the breasts.
It has a wiki but said wiki defines it in such a way that pretty much every image on the entire site should have the tag.
skylightcrystal said:
It has a wiki but said wiki defines it in such a way that pretty much every image on the entire site should have the tag.
Imo it's redundant. Each picture shohuld be moved to the corrent tag if it's not there already (scenery, cityscape, etc) and that tag should be emptied out.
skylightcrystal said:
It has a wiki but said wiki defines it in such a way that pretty much every image on the entire site should have the tag.
The last time that tag was mentioned in this topic, there was a suggestion (forum #135613) that it could be repurposed for anime background art or the like. Otherwise, it's far too vague to be of any use.
