Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
Cute image of Ruby and Sapphire, comparable to others of the same couple drawn by the same artist, tagged chikorita85 ruby_(pokemon) odamaki_sapphire which got accepted. It also references the Pokédex as stated in the image description.
Updated
post #2538228
For completion sake.
Amazing, detailed art with apparently all legendary and mythical Pokémon up to Generation 5. Collab work of two artists. It got deleted just because 3 days passed.
Realistic image of a Pokémon, the female Meowstic. It has the same quality as other posts of realistic Pokémon by the same author which got accepted: pokemon shadeofshinon.
Unable to submit appeal for post #3027994 so I'm filing it here:
Character anatomy is not egregiously out of proportion and overall image is competently drawn; Large thighs and wide hips can be done well, especially considering the kind of pose here often accentuates those parts. There is good coloring, shading and painting style. As well, flag reason is invalid due to making blatantly false claims about the character's anatomy.
Starting to understand why people go here to appeal instead of using the broken appeal function.
Since the system refuses to accept my appeal for post #3004214, I'm filing it here:
Everything about the image is top notch, quite honestly. Detailed art, well-drawn, up to bar with the artist's usual work.
Given the focus of this piece and the PoV being used, I think it's unnecessarily harsh to have it deleted over a minor issue over a difficult perspective.
Please reconsider
post #3027030
post #3025138
Both are higher resolution versions of already approved pictures, taken from an official CG set.
As mentioned in my automated appeal notice, this seemingly fell through the cracks of the mod queue - I say this because the deletion notice made no mention of any mods seeing the image and disliking or deciding not to approve it. I looked the image over as carefully as I was able, and I could not find any glaring errors, nor do I believe the image is below site standards. It's beautiful, and I feel like it deserves one last shot.
I didn't see anything about posting here and also using the automated process effectively being a double post, so if that's the case, I apologize.
WatcherCCG said:
As mentioned in my automated appeal notice, this seemingly fell through the cracks of the mod queue - I say this because the deletion notice made no mention of any mods seeing the image and disliking or deciding not to approve it.
The statistics for how many approvers viewed an image and what their response was are deleted after a while, roughly after one month, IIRC. You can be sure that your post was reviewed my multiple approvers and did not “fall through the cracks of the mod queue”.
kittey said:
The statistics for how many approvers viewed an image and what their response was are deleted after a while, roughly after one month, IIRC. You can be sure that your post was reviewed my multiple approvers and did not “fall through the cracks of the mod queue”.
Correct.
Every post gets reviewed by 12 Approvers, at least.
That's the amount of Approvers that are using these options.
But I think no matter how often this gets explained, I think someone will always complain about it or use it as an appeal reason.
post #2686496 doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it.
