The below seem to be part of a continuous series: The others are of similar quality and have been approved
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
The below seem to be part of a continuous series: The others are of similar quality and have been approved
nonamethanks said:
I wasn't even aware of your version when I posted that pic because it was deleted.
But now you are. And my version's still bigger and more detailed. So what's up?
since approvers are told to only approve what they personally like.
oh...those...uhm...
What can I do to be the one of those who's approving?? 'cause the tasteless approvers is my personal nightmare ((
All posts in pool #12387 - Embraced by the Curtain of Night.
More under the collapsible.
post #2733357
post #2733358
post #2733364
post #2733366
post #2733368
post #2733370
post #2733374
post #2733379
post #2733382
post #2733385
post #2733386
post #2733389
post #2733390
post #2733395
post #2733396
post #2733398
post #2733401
post #2733404
post #2733405
post #2733406
post #2733407
post #2733408
post #2733409
post #2733410
Updated
These posts are alright. not good, but not bad either. Pls reconsider.
oh, and post #2874697. I think it's unfair for it to be deleted just because of a finger.
It's a sketch that isn't in usual quality for the artist, but I don't think intentional sketches like this should always fall under a "poor quality" reason (less so when there's no other detail with the flag). This post also seemed to be valid for over 3 months, while the flagger only seemed to notice after seeing it bumped in the comments on 9/27.
part of an ongoing slice-of-life series
post #2876082
Good shading & all that.
Parant
post #2703371
childeren
post #2703376
post #2703377
Both of these images are ultra highres official artworks, why were they deleted? Especially the first one since its a logoless version of its parent image which was approved.
I don't see anything wrong of this said images.