How do I tag this?

☆♪ said:

post #2866319: The diagram / mission plan / whatever on the whiteboard. I wanted to use diagram but that looks like it's for when the image itself is a diagram, not contains one.

Diagram applies to both images containing diagrams and being them.
---
post #2687290 is currently taged greyscale which is obviously wrong. Do we have a tag for grayscale background?

ion288 said:

post #2687290 is currently taged greyscale which is obviously wrong. Do we have a tag for grayscale background?

I would use gradient background along with grey background.

Even the background isn't really greyscale, it's just desaturated. It would be muted color if the whole image looked like that. There isn't a muted background tag but there probably could be. There's pale background with only 1 post.

Technically that background might be bokeh but IMO it's too abstract and shouldn't get that tag.

The white flowers are? post #2867664

90sAnimeFan said:

The white flowers are? post #2867664

kousa_dogwood

Thanks! But it seems there's no tag for them, not yet anyway.

When an image consists of multiple pictures and some of those are monochrome should it be taged so?

post #2677391
post #2385146

ion288 said:

When an image consists of multiple pictures and some of those are monochrome should it be taged so?

post #2677391
post #2385146

partially_colored

What vegetable is on the top right of this image?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2569384?tags=hidari_%28left_side%29
Currently, it's tagged as onion, but those look more like garlic. But garlic doesn't grow like that...

onlyaw said:

What vegetable is on the top right of this image?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2569384?tags=hidari_%28left_side%29
Currently, it's tagged as onion, but those look more like garlic. But garlic doesn't grow like that...

Looks to me like a bunch of garlic heads tied together. I've seen them knotted like that before.

post #2868453
I'm having constant problems with tagging this top. So I decided I finally ask here <<.
Also is plumb correct here? Just asking because I never got to use this tag...

Chiera said:

post #2868453
I'm having constant problems with tagging this top. So I decided I finally ask here <<.
Also is plumb correct here? Just asking because I never got to use this tag...

Isn't that just a crop top?

Unbreakable said:

Isn't that just a crop top?

Looks more like a sports bra to me.

Also, I believe this does, in fact, qualify as "plump".

iridescent_slime said:

Looks more like a sports bra to me.

Also, I believe this does, in fact, qualify as "plump".

Thanks a bunch :3

Is that a babydoll here?
post #2868732
I actually tagged it as one, but the length makes me shiver :3.

Chiera said:

Thanks a bunch :3

Is that a babydoll here?
post #2868732
I actually tagged it as one, but the length makes me shiver :3.

I'd say not, a babydoll is meant to be complete wear but with her I see both an upper and a skirt. It's odd but I would call it a strapless bustier myself.

post #2077603 (NSFW) has Misato Katsuragi's face featured in the speech bubble located to the top-right "corner" from Asuka's head (the redhead). Misato herself, however, is not depicted in the image; she's "off-panel", to use comicbook terminology.

Is there a tag for when the only evidence of a character's existence in an image is a miniature version of their face/head being drawn inside a speech bubble?

A related question: Does a speech bubble that has at least one unambiguous sign of being delivered by a specific character -- such as the character's name, or another character identifying the first character in their own dialogue -- count as sufficient for tagging said character in the image even if they're not actually depicted in it? Because I've come across quite a few KanColle comics that do this.

MarqFJA87 said:

post #2077603 (NSFW) has Misato Katsuragi's face featured in the speech bubble located to the top-right "corner" from Asuka's head (the redhead). Misato herself, however, is not depicted in the image; she's "off-panel", to use comicbook terminology.

Is there a tag for when the only evidence of a character's existence in an image is a miniature version of their face/head being drawn inside a speech bubble?
...

cameo + katsuragi_misato_(cameo)

http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2870022 does this qualify for silhouette, sky, scenery? Also, are any of the colors for the character herself strong enough to tag? Like pink_hair, blue_skirt?

netheoc said:

http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2870022 does this qualify for silhouette, sky, scenery? Also, are any of the colors for the character herself strong enough to tag? Like pink_hair, blue_skirt?

Silhouette no, scenery (only barely) and sky yes. I've added a few other tags.
I think pink_hair qualifies because you can tell the color apart from the rest, but as for the skirt there's really no way to tell if you go by the "tag what you see" rule.

Thighhighs in post #2870194 ? They're like bridal_gauntlets for legs and I swear I've seen a tag for them before, but I forget what it might possibly be.