Updated by Unbreakable
Posted under General
My apologies for using the wrong thread:
sweetpeɐ said:
I do not think this should just be banned, rather the person who flagged the post could be gotten in contact with.
Provence said:
Wrong topic(?), but I approved it for now.
Updated by Unbreakable
sweetpeɐ said:
My apologies for using the wrong thread:
You can also ban if needed. I'm unsure if this also counts for commisions, though.
Updated by Unbreakable
Provence said:
You can also ban if needed. I'm unsure if this also counts for commisions, though.
I don't think it does count. Under American copyright conventions and I'm guessing Japanese, the content creator automatically holds the copyright, not who paid for it. If you take a picture for instance you instantly hold a copyright for it barring agreements you may make with someone (working for a photography company for instance). I don't think we should ban it without a valid request from the artist... I'm just suggesting an admin maybe get in contact with the reporter. Anyone could just flag a post and say they commissioned it, I could right now.
Updated by Unbreakable
post #2640210 isn't by a banned artist? How come you're requesting a ban?
Updated by Unbreakable
Probably also these two explicit posts, but I haven’t looked at them to verify:
post #29718
post #148959
Updated by Unbreakable
post #2680622
post #2680633
Third-party edits of post #2680601.
Said third party is actually asking to remove them: https://2ch.hk/to/res/47265.html#47671
Although I'm not sure if they should be banned or just flagged for deletion.
Updated by Unbreakable
worldendDominator said:
post #2680622
post #2680633
Third-party edits of post #2680601.
Said third party is actually asking to remove them: https://2ch.hk/to/res/47265.html#47671Although I'm not sure if they should be banned or just flagged for deletion.
Flag them. And if there are more photoshops of Hater's art, flag those too.
Updated by Unbreakable
worldendDominator said:
Third-party edits of post #2680601.
Said third party is actually asking to remove them: https://2ch.hk/to/res/47265.html#47671
Are we sure post #2680601 is actually by hater (hatater)?
Аноним said:
Even I myself don't like the idea of such sloppy shops (made against the author's will too) making their way to the site that's supposed to aggregate quality and original works. […] Even more so when the only reason for it is that they closely resemble hatater's style.
If I understand the Russian anon correctly, he drew it in a style similarly to hatater’s, so shouldn’t it be tagged drawfag style_parody instead?
Updated by Unbreakable
kittey said:
Are we sure post #2680601 is actually by hater (hatater)?
Yes pixiv #62246370
Updated by Unbreakable
Omegamagnum said:
post #2702410
Sakimichan.
Can we now upload from banned artists or not? I feel like there is always only a spongy reply when this is asked and in case of sakimichan, there is one user that was banned by @Apollyon for not listening to stop uploading from this artist...
Updated by Unbreakable
provence said:
Can we now upload from banned artists or not? I feel like there is always only a spongy reply when this is asked and in case of sakimichan, there is one user that was banned by @Apollyon for not listening to stop uploading from this artist...
Only janitors can really safely do it though. In the case that the upload page doesn't automatically detect and ban a post, then the janitor is responsible and has the privilege of doing it. Other users don't, and it would immediately look suspicious if this thread started to get much more frequent bumps.
The problem stems more from if no one lets anyone else know to immediately ban a post ASAP by posting in this thread. IIRC @Rignak has done it a few times, but luckily I was there to notice. It's a problem with other booru imageboards also (yande.re specifically) but as they don't keep their banned artist list up to date as we do, the policy is rarely enforced. See here.
Updated by Unbreakable